Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Block defect groups are p radical

Statement

Every block defect group satisfies D=Op(NG(D)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A defect group D of a block of a finite group G over a field of characteristic p.

[F1]

For every Sylow PD there is hCG(D) with D=PhPh1. (Block defect is an intersection of two sylow subgroups)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put N=NG(D). Choose a Sylow subgroup T of N containing D, and a Sylow subgroup P of G containing T, by [F2]. Then PN is a p-subgroup of N containing its Sylow subgroup T, hence equals T. Take hCG(D)N from [F1]. Intersecting D=PhPh1 with N gives D=(PN)h(PN)h1=ThTh1.

F1F2
2.1

The product of normal p-subgroups of a finite group is a normal p-subgroup: for two factors its order is the product of their orders divided by the intersection order, by counting representations of a product element. A finite product over all such subgroups therefore defines Op(N). If V is Sylow in N, normality makes Op(N)V a p-subgroup containing V, hence equal to V. Thus Op(N) lies in both T and hTh1, so in D by step 1.1. Conversely DN by the definition of its normalizer and D is a p-group, so DOp(N). Both inclusions prove equality.

step 1.1

Sources

Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§11.3, 11.6 and 12.3–12.5, especially pp.240–245. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources