How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A map with everywhere-invertible derivative is open
Statement
Let , let be open, and let be . Suppose is invertible for every . Then maps every open subset of to an open subset of . Thus is an open map (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The map in the Statement and an open subset .
At every point with invertible derivative, there are open sets on which the map restricts to a diffeomorphism onto (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).
Proof
Let and choose with . Apply [L1] at and replace its source neighbourhood by its intersection with ; the image of that smaller neighbourhood is an open neighbourhood of contained in .
Thus every point of is interior. If , its image is the open empty set, so is open in every case.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, Corollary 8.5.2 (standard reference, not scraped)