How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every open map has invertible derivative
Statement
False claim: every open map between open subsets of Euclidean space has invertible derivative at every point.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: No assumptions beyond the false claim.
The map is a smooth open bijection of with derivative zero at the origin, but its inverse is not differentiable there ( is a bijection whose inverse is not differentiable at zero).
A map with everywhere-invertible derivative is an open map (A map with everywhere-invertible derivative is open).
Refutation
The cube map in [L1] is open and , but its derivative at zero is the zero linear map, which is not invertible.
Therefore openness does not imply derivative invertibility. The valid result [L2] is only the forward sufficient implication from derivative invertibility to openness.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, §8.5 (standard reference, not scraped)