How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: zero derivative on an open set forces constancy
Statement
False claim: if a differentiable map has zero derivative at every point of an open Euclidean domain, then it is constant.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: No connectedness hypothesis is imposed in the false claim.
There is an open set and a function on it whose total derivative is zero at every point of , but which is not constant on (Zero derivative need not give constancy on a disconnected open set).
If is nonempty, open, and connected, then on if and only if is constant on (A differentiable map on a connected open Euclidean set has zero derivative exactly when it is constant).
Refutation
The construction in [L1] satisfies the derivative hypothesis and violates the conclusion, so it refutes the claim.
The comparison with [L2] identifies connectedness as the missing hypothesis: adding it restores exactly the stated equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Cañez, Northwestern Math 320-2 lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)