How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A regular connected covering has deck group
Statement
Let be a regular connected covering of a path-connected locally path-connected base. Put and . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The regular connected covering and groups in the Statement.
For a connected covering, ( for a connected covering).
A connected covering is regular exactly when is normal in (A connected covering is regular exactly when its induced subgroup is normal, exactly when deck transformations act transitively on a fibre).
The normalizer is (The normalizer of a subgroup).
Proof
By [L2], regularity gives , so every preserves under conjugation and [F1] gives .
Substitution of in [L1] yields .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Proposition 1.39 (standard reference, not scraped)