Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact connected abelian subgroups lie in maximal tori

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every compact connected abelian subgroup of a compact Lie group is contained in a maximal torus.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice, a compact Lie group G, and a subgroup AG that is compact, connected and abelian.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice; it supplies the countable choice assumed by the closed-subgroup theorem in [L2] and supplies the stated hypothesis of [L3], whose current maximum-dimension proof needs no choice.

[L2]

A closed subgroup of a finite-dimensional real Lie group is an embedded Lie subgroup, so a compact connected abelian subgroup of G is a compact connected abelian Lie group, i.e. a torus; a torus of G is by definition such a closed Lie subgroup (Cartan closed subgroup theorem, Tori and maximal tori).

[L3]

Every torus of a compact Lie group is contained in a maximal torus (Existence of maximal tori).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since G is Hausdorff and A is compact, A is closed by [L1]; by [L2] the subgroup A is an embedded Lie subgroup, and it is a compact connected abelian Lie group, hence a torus in the sense of the definition.

L1L2
2.1

By [L3] the torus A is contained in a maximal torus of G, which is the required conclusion. The Axiom of Choice entered through the closed-subgroup theorem in [L2] and supplies the retained hypothesis of [L3]; the proof of [L3] itself uses no choice.

A1L2L3step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources