How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
h^1 of a line bundle equals the dimension of the space of dual sections
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the duality suppliers. Let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over a field , let be a canonical divisor and let be a divisor on . Then i.e. the index of speciality of equals the dimension of the space of sections of the dual twist, and the full Riemann-Roch identity may accordingly be written with no unknown term.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice; a field ; a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over ; a canonical divisor on ; and a divisor on .
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Divisors on form a free abelian group on the closed points, with support, positive and negative parts and degree ; addition and subtraction of divisors are defined componentwise and canonical divisors are divisors of rational differentials (Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors).
The index of speciality of is , computed from the invertible sheaf attached to ; it depends only on the linear equivalence class of and is a nonnegative integer (The index of speciality i(D)).
Over any field , for an invertible -module on the smooth proper geometrically integral curve one has , with the dual (Tensor product of sheaves of modules), and the pairing realizing this equality is perfect and functorial in (Serre duality for line bundles on a smooth proper curve, and the residue realization).
For a canonical divisor the canonical bundle satisfies for the invertible sheaf attached to the divisor, by the dictionary between invertible sheaves with a rational section and divisors (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors).
The in-run draft theorem on line bundles and divisors (authored as a draft in this run; its supplier closure remains pending) states: on an integral scheme, every pair of an invertible sheaf and a nonzero rational section determines a Cartier divisor with carrying its canonical rational section to ; conversely every Cartier divisor arises, and pair isomorphism is the equivalence relation. In particular, applied to and a nonzero rational section with divisor , it gives . This is the promised claim of Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, treated here as a declared supplier.
The in-run draft definition of the Riemann-Roch space (authored as a draft in this run; its supplier closure remains pending) states: for a divisor on the smooth proper geometrically integral curve one sets , and under the identification of divisors with invertible sheaves as a -subspace of , so that . This is the promised claim of The space L(D), treated here as a declared supplier.
Euler-characteristic Riemann-Roch in divisor notation gives for every divisor over the arbitrary field (Riemann-Roch as l minus i). Its divisor dictionary suppliers remain the declared in-run draft prerequisites.
Cartier divisor addition and inverse give canonical isomorphisms and (Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves), with the curve divisor dictionary as in [F2, F5, F6].
Proof
Proof technique: direct; apply line-bundle duality to and translate into with the divisor-line-bundle dictionary.
The divisor and the canonical divisor are divisors on the curve in the sense of [F2], so that degrees and differences of divisors are defined; the divisor has an attached invertible sheaf , and the index of speciality is [F3]; the canonical divisor is a divisor on with [F5].
Apply the line-bundle duality theorem [F4] to the invertible sheaf : .
The inverse of the invertible sheaf is and the tensor product is commutative up to canonical isomorphism, so by [F9].
By the divisor-line-bundle dictionary [F6], applied to the invertible sheaf and a rational section whose divisor is , one has ; this uses from step 1.1 and the additivity of the divisor of a rational section, so taking global sections gives .
The Riemann-Roch space of satisfies by [F7], so the right-hand side is the dimension of the space of sections of the dual twist .
Chaining the equalities of steps 1.1, 5.1 and the intervening computations, : the index of speciality of equals the dimension of the space of sections of the dual twist, and applying [F8] gives . Substituting into that identity, the full Riemann-Roch identity reads with no unknown term, and the Axiom of Choice is inherited through the duality suppliers [F1].
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Canonical bundle and canonical divisors
- Divisors on a smooth proper curve
- The index of speciality i(D)
- The space L(D)
- Tensor product of sheaves of modules
- Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves
- Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors
- Riemann-Roch as l minus i
- Serre duality for line bundles on a smooth proper curve, and the residue realization
Used by
- H¹ of a line bundle vanishes above degree 2g - 2 Corollary
- One cocycle carried through the residue realization of Serre duality Example
- Residues on the projective line and the vanishing of their sum Example
- The canonical map: base-point-freeness and the hyperelliptic exception Theorem
- The full Riemann-Roch theorem for divisors on a smooth proper curve Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
95 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (version of October 21, 2025) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joseph Lipman, Residues, duality, and the fundamental class of a scheme-map (2011) (standard reference, not scraped)