Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

h^1 of a line bundle equals the dimension of the space of dual sections

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the duality suppliers. Let C be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over a field k, let KC be a canonical divisor and let D be a divisor on C. Then h1(C,OC(D))=h0(C,OC(KC−D))=l(KC−D), i.e. the index of speciality of D equals the dimension of the space of sections of the dual twist, and the full Riemann-Roch identity may accordingly be written l(D)−l(KC−D)=deg⁡k(D)+1−g with no unknown term.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice; a field k; a smooth proper geometrically integral curve C over k; a canonical divisor KC on C; and a divisor D on C.

[F1]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

Divisors on C form a free abelian group on the closed points, with support, positive and negative parts and degree deg⁡k; addition and subtraction of divisors are defined componentwise and canonical divisors are divisors of rational differentials (Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors).

[F3]

The index of speciality of D is i(D):=h1(C,OC(D))=dim⁡kH1(C,OC(D)), computed from the invertible sheaf OC(D) attached to D; it depends only on the linear equivalence class of D and is a nonnegative integer (The index of speciality i(D)).

[F4]

Over any field k, for an invertible OC-module L on the smooth proper geometrically integral curve C one has h1(C,L)=h0(C,ωC⊗L−1), with L−1=L∨ the dual (Tensor product of sheaves of modules), and the pairing realizing this equality is perfect and functorial in L (Serre duality for line bundles on a smooth proper curve, and the residue realization).

[F5]

For a canonical divisor KC the canonical bundle satisfies ωC≅OC(KC) for the invertible sheaf attached to the divisor, by the dictionary between invertible sheaves with a rational section and divisors (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors).

[F6]

The in-run draft theorem on line bundles and divisors (authored as a draft in this run; its supplier closure remains pending) states: on an integral scheme, every pair (L,s) of an invertible sheaf and a nonzero rational section determines a Cartier divisor div⁡C(s) with OX(div⁡C(s))≅L carrying its canonical rational section 1 to s; conversely every Cartier divisor arises, and pair isomorphism is the equivalence relation. In particular, applied to L=ωC⊗OC(−D) and a nonzero rational section with divisor KC−D, it gives ωC⊗OC(−D)≅OC(KC−D). This is the promised claim of Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, treated here as a declared supplier.

[F7]

The in-run draft definition of the Riemann-Roch space (authored as a draft in this run; its supplier closure remains pending) states: for a divisor D on the smooth proper geometrically integral curve C one sets L(D)={f∈k(C)×:div⁡(f)+D≥0}∪{0}, and under the identification of divisors with invertible sheaves L(D)=H0(C,OC(D)) as a k-subspace of k(C), so that l(D)=dim⁡kL(D)=h0(C,OC(D)). This is the promised claim of The space L(D), treated here as a declared supplier.

[F8]

Euler-characteristic Riemann-Roch in divisor notation gives l(D)−i(D)=deg⁡k(D)+1−g for every divisor over the arbitrary field (Riemann-Roch as l minus i). Its divisor dictionary suppliers remain the declared in-run draft prerequisites.

[F9]

Cartier divisor addition and inverse give canonical isomorphisms OC(KC)⊗OC(−D)≅OC(KC−D) and OC(D)∨≅OC(−D) (Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves), with the curve divisor dictionary as in [F2, F5, F6].

Proof

Proof technique: direct; apply line-bundle duality to L=OC(D) and translate ωC⊗OC(−D) into OC(KC−D) with the divisor-line-bundle dictionary.

1.1F2F3F5

The divisor D and the canonical divisor KC are divisors on the curve in the sense of [F2], so that degrees and differences of divisors are defined; the divisor D has an attached invertible sheaf OC(D), and the index of speciality is i(D)=h1(C,OC(D)) [F3]; the canonical divisor KC is a divisor on C with ωC≅OC(KC) [F5].

2.1F4step 1.1

Apply the line-bundle duality theorem [F4] to the invertible sheaf L=OC(D): h1(C,OC(D))=h0(C,ωC⊗OC(D)−1).

3.1F4F9step 2.1

The inverse of the invertible sheaf OC(D) is OC(−D) and the tensor product is commutative up to canonical isomorphism, so ωC⊗OC(D)−1≅ωC⊗OC(−D) by [F9].

4.1F5F6F9step 1.1step 3.1

By the divisor-line-bundle dictionary [F6], applied to the invertible sheaf ωC⊗OC(−D) and a rational section whose divisor is KC−D, one has ωC⊗OC(−D)≅OC(KC−D); this uses ωC≅OC(KC) from step 1.1 and the additivity of the divisor of a rational section, so taking global sections gives h0(C,ωC⊗OC(−D))=h0(C,OC(KC−D)).

5.1F7step 4.1

The Riemann-Roch space of KC−D satisfies l(KC−D)=h0(C,OC(KC−D)) by [F7], so the right-hand side is the dimension of the space of sections of the dual twist OC(KC−D).

6.1F1F3F4F8step 2.1step 5.1∎

Chaining the equalities of steps 1.1, 5.1 and the intervening computations, i(D)=h1(C,OC(D))=h0(C,OC(KC−D))=l(KC−D): the index of speciality of D equals the dimension of the space of sections of the dual twist, and applying [F8] gives l(D)−i(D)=deg⁡k(D)+1−g. Substituting i(D)=l(KC−D) into that identity, the full Riemann-Roch identity reads l(D)−l(KC−D)=deg⁡k(D)+1−g with no unknown term, and the Axiom of Choice is inherited through the duality suppliers [F1].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

95 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources