How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cauchy representation of an function from its boundary values
Statement
Assume countable choice, as in the Hardy and circle conventions. Let and let be the unique finite complex Borel measure on with . Then and for the boundary function of the Fatou theorem, and for every Moreover and as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and .
The CC analytic Hardy boundary theorem gives , , and . Its analytic H1 representing measure exists and is unique under CC. (Fatou's boundary theorem for analytic Hardy spaces, Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc, The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
The density measure is countably additive by dominated convergence; its finite positive variation is supplied by the local CC circle-variation lemma, and the direct density formula gives total variation integral , and finite complex circle measures with equal Poisson integrals are equal under CC. (A complex L^1 density defines a complex measure whose total variation is |h| dmu, Complex circle measures have finite regular total variation under countable choice, Finite complex circle measures are determined by Fourier coefficients and Poisson integrals)
Cauchy's integral formula applies on every radius-r circle with |z|<r<1. The torus parametrization is with . (Cauchy's integral formula on a circle compactly contained in a disc of holomorphy, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral)
The Poisson integral is the kernel integral against the boundary datum. L1 convergence and uniform convergence of bounded weights imply convergence of their integrals, by the estimate . (The Poisson integral of a finite complex boundary measure)
Proof
Apply [F1] and set . By [F2] it is a finite complex representing measure for f, and its total variation is . Every other finite complex representing measure has the same Poisson integral, so [F2] proves it equals mu. Thus the unique measure in the Statement is exactly this absolutely continuous density measure, including mu zero when f zero.
By [F1] and [F4], , and . Together with step 1.1 this gives the full Poisson, absolute-continuity, uniqueness and norm assertions under CC.
The Cauchy formula. Fix and . The function is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the closed disc of radius , so [F3] gives . Writing the circle integral in the torus parametrization, this equals (the factor is ). As , the weights converge uniformly on to and are uniformly bounded for , because ; together with from step 2.1, [F4] gives the last equality being the same parametrization at .
Assembly. Step 1.1 gives with the norm identity, step 2.1 gives and the convergence of the radial functions, and step 3.1 gives the Cauchy representation of by its boundary values.
Depends on
- Complex circle measures have finite regular total variation under countable choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Fatou's boundary theorem for analytic Hardy spaces
- Finite complex circle measures are determined by Fourier coefficients and Poisson integrals
- A complex L^1 density defines a complex measure whose total variation is |h| dmu
- Cauchy's integral formula on a circle compactly contained in a disc of holomorphy
- Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc
- The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral
- The Poisson integral of a finite complex boundary measure
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
108 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. K. Srivastava, Lecture Notes on Hardy Spaces (MA650, IIT Guwahati), §5.7 and §5.11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- L. Ryzhik, Stanford Math 215 Course Notes, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)