How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The F. and M. Riesz theorem
Statement
Assume countable choice, as in the circle and Hardy conventions. Let be a finite complex Borel measure on whose Fourier coefficients vanish for every . Then is absolutely continuous with respect to . More precisely, is holomorphic on and lies in , and if is the boundary function of the Fatou theorem for analytic then ; consequently .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and a finite complex Borel measure on the circle with for every n<0; put .
The analytic Poisson coefficient criterion gives f holomorphic and in H1, with . Under CC complex circle measures have finite regular total variation. (Analytic Poisson integrals are exactly the measures with vanishing negative coefficients, Complex circle measures have finite regular total variation under countable choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
The CC analytic Hardy boundary theorem gives , finite nontangential limits, and . (Fatou's boundary theorem for analytic Hardy spaces, Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc)
The circle Fourier coefficients of are , and equality of all Fourier coefficients determines a complex circle measure under CC. Fourier coefficients of L1 functions are bounded linear integrals. (Finite complex circle measures are determined by Fourier coefficients and Poisson integrals, Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus)
An L1 density h defines a complex measure h m by dominated convergence. Its known finite positive variation is supplied by the local CC circle-variation lemma; the direct unit-bounded simple-integral and phase-approximation argument gives . (A complex L^1 density defines a complex measure whose total variation is |h| dmu, Complex circle measures have finite regular total variation under countable choice)
Proof
By [F1], is holomorphic and in H1. By [F2] it has the boundary function with radial convergence and the exact H1 norm. This covers f zero as well.
Let , a finite complex measure by [F4]. For each integer n, [F3] gives . convergence in step 1.1 implies , since the character has modulus one. Letting r increase to one yields . Fourier uniqueness [F3] gives , so . No general h1 measure-existence theorem is invoked; the measure mu was already given.
By [F4] and step 2.1, . Step 1.1 gives , proving the full norm identity. Holomorphy, boundary representation, absolute continuity and all stated equalities have now been established under CC.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc
- Fatou's boundary theorem for analytic Hardy spaces
- Analytic Poisson integrals are exactly the measures with vanishing negative coefficients
- Complex circle measures have finite regular total variation under countable choice
- Finite complex circle measures are determined by Fourier coefficients and Poisson integrals
- A complex L^1 density defines a complex measure whose total variation is |h| dmu
- Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. Ryzhik, Stanford Math 215 Course Notes, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. B. Garnett, Bounded Analytic Functions, revised first edition, Chapter II §3, Theorem 3.6 (standard reference, not scraped)