How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Analytic Poisson integrals are exactly the measures with vanishing negative coefficients
Statement
Assume countable choice, as in the circle conventions. Let be a finite complex Borel measure on and let where exponents are read through the identification of with the Euclidean unit circle, so that is the character of Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus. The following are equivalent:
(i) is holomorphic on ;
(ii) for , the power series obtained from the Poisson kernel expansion, with no negative powers of ;
(iii) for every .
When these hold, with , and its Taylor coefficients are the , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and a finite complex Borel measure on , its Poisson integral , and the coefficients , .
Setting identified with the Euclidean unit circle through , the Poisson kernel is for , , and ; for one has (The Poisson integral of a finite complex boundary measure, The Poisson kernel on the unit disc, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral).
The kernel is strictly positive with unit mass: and for (The Poisson kernel is positive, has total mass one, and concentrates at a boundary point).
Characters satisfy , , , , and they are orthonormal: (Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus, The trigonometric characters are orthonormal in of the torus).
Under CC every complex circle measure has finite regular total variation, and integration obeys . In particular . (Complex circle measures have finite regular total variation under countable choice, Integrals against signed or complex measures are bounded by total variation, The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Fubini's theorem applies to functions integrable for a product of sigma-finite measures, and Tonelli's theorem applies to nonnegative product-measurable functions (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).
A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred open disc contained in its domain, and the sum of a complex power series is analytic, hence holomorphic, on its open disc of convergence; a complex power series converges absolutely and uniformly on every closed subdisc strictly inside its disc of convergence (A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain, The sum of a complex power series is analytic throughout its open disc of convergence, A complex function is holomorphic if and only if it is analytic, A complex power series converges absolutely and uniformly on every closed subdisc strictly inside its disc of convergence).
The classes with their (quasi-)norms are those of Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc; in particular (Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc, Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions).
Proof
Expansion of the kernel. Fix and , put , so that and , and put , so . Dividing numerator and denominator of by and using gives ; since for , and while , taking real parts yields a series that converges absolutely and uniformly in for fixed , because and .
(ii) implies (i). Assume (ii) and put . Since for every , the series converges for ; its sum is analytic on the open unit disc by [L6] and hence holomorphic there by A complex function is holomorphic if and only if it is analytic, and (ii) says . Thus (i) holds.
The bound. For every and every radius , [L1] and [L4] give and hence, integrating over the circle against , the interchange is Tonelli's theorem applied to the nonnegative product-measurable integrand , and the inner integral equals the unit mass of the kernel by [L2] together with translation invariance of , the substitution showing .
Termwise integration and the two-sided expansion. For fixed the partial sums of the series of step 1.1 converge uniformly on to the continuous function , so integrating term by term against the finite complex measure gives since and, for , by the substitution . This identity holds for every finite complex Borel measure and every .
Fourier coefficients of the radial traces. Fix and , and regard a torus element also as the unit-circle point , writing . Since , evaluating step 2.1 at gives a series that converges uniformly in because by [L4]; the function is therefore continuous and its -th Fourier coefficient is by termwise integration and orthonormality.
Equivalence of (ii) and (iii). If (iii) holds, the second sum in the expansion of step 2.1 vanishes termwise, so for every , which is (ii). Conversely assume (ii). For and , the right side of (ii) is the uniformly convergent series on (uniform convergence as in step 3.1, using ), so integrating it against and using orthonormality gives ; by step 3.1 this equals , hence for every , which is (iii).
(i) implies (iii), and the Taylor coefficients. Assume (i). By [L6] the holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout , and this series converges uniformly on the closed subdisc for every fixed . Fix such an and . Evaluating at gives the uniformly convergent series ; integrating against and using orthonormality, its -th Fourier coefficient is when and when . Comparing with the identity of step 3.1 gives for , so for every (take any ), and for , so for every , which is (iii).
Assembly. Steps 4.1, 1.2 and 4.2 prove that (i), (ii) and (iii) are equivalent: (ii) and (iii) are equivalent by step 4.1, (ii) implies (i) by step 1.2, and (i) implies (iii) by step 4.2, while (iii) implies (ii) again by step 4.1. If the equivalent conditions hold, then by step 4.2 the Taylor coefficients of are for , its holomorphy is (i), and step 1.3 gives by [L7], so with the asserted bound.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Complex circle measures have finite regular total variation under countable choice
- The Poisson integral of a finite complex boundary measure
- The Poisson kernel on the unit disc
- The Poisson kernel is positive, has total mass one, and concentrates at a boundary point
- Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus
- The trigonometric characters are orthonormal in $L^2$ of the torus
- A complex power series converges absolutely and uniformly on every closed subdisc strictly inside its disc of convergence
- A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain
- The sum of a complex power series is analytic throughout its open disc of convergence
- A complex function is holomorphic if and only if it is analytic
- Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions
- The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral
- Dominated convergence
- Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Integrals against signed or complex measures are bounded by total variation
- Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc
Used by
- The F. and M. Riesz theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
121 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. Ryzhik, Stanford Math 215 Course Notes, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. B. Garnett, Bounded Analytic Functions, revised first edition, Chapter II §3, Theorem 3.6 (standard reference, not scraped)