How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Henstock–Kurzweil substitution for a derivative composed with a differentiable map
Statement
Let , let be differentiable, let be a nondegenerate interval containing , and let be differentiable with . Then is Henstock–Kurzweil integrable and
No monotonicity of is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The functions and the containing interval in the Statement.
Every derivative is Henstock–Kurzweil integrable and evaluates by endpoint difference (Every derivative is Henstock–Kurzweil integrable and satisfies Newton–Leibniz).
Proof
Applying [L1] throughout identifies the derivative of as , including a constant .
Applying [L2] to the composite gives its HK integrability and the displayed endpoint formula, which also covers reversed endpoint values of .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alessandro Fonda, The Kurzweil-Henstock Integral for Undergraduates, Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Bruckner, Judith Bruckner and Brian Thomson, Real Analysis, Section 1.21 (standard reference, not scraped)