How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Jones span detects crossing number for reduced alternating knots
Statement
Assume full AC. If is a connected reduced alternating diagram of a knot , then the library Jones polynomial has -span exactly , in the convention . The span of a nonzero Laurent polynomial is its largest exponent minus its smallest exponent.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full AC, a connected reduced alternating knot diagram , and the crossing number of its underlying knot type.
Full AC implies countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The crossing number is the least crossing count among regular diagrams of the same underlying unoriented link type (Crossing number of a link).
Under full AC, a reduced alternating knot diagram with crossings has Jones span , while every competing -crossing knot diagram has Jones span at most (Adequacy and Jones span of reduced alternating diagrams).
A reduced alternating diagram is connected and alternating by definition (Reduced alternating link diagram).
Full AC, the choice-function principle for arbitrary families of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
By [A1] and [F1], the crossing-number definition [F2] applies. Since is a connected reduced alternating diagram by [F4], [F3] gives .
For every regular diagram of the same underlying knot type, choose its single-component orientation to match . By [F3], because the common Jones span is and is at most . The diagram itself is one of the competitors in [F2], so ; the preceding inequality for every gives . Thus , and step 1.1 gives the asserted Jones span.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Danny Calegari, Introduction to Knot Theory, §5.2, printed pp. 44–45 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Louis H. Kauffman, New Invariants in the Theory of Knots, Astérisque 163–164 (1988), §III, pp. 164–168 (standard reference, not scraped)