How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Crossing number of a link
Definition
Assume . Let be an unoriented link type in . Its crossing number is the least element of
Definition references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and an unoriented link type in .
A link is a finite disjoint union of smoothly embedded circles in , and it may be moved off into before projection (Oriented links in the three-sphere and ambient isotopy).
A regular diagram is a finite planar projection with transverse double points, no triple points, and over-under data (Regular oriented link diagrams).
Under countable choice, every oriented link admits a regular projection (Existence of regular projections).
Every nonempty subset of has a least element (The well-ordering principle).
Countable choice, abbreviated , selects one element from each member of a countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Let be the displayed set of crossing counts. By [F1], move an oriented representative off into ; [F3] and [A1] give it a regular diagram. Forgetting the diagram's strand arrows gives a regular diagram of the same unoriented type, so .
The set is a nonempty subset of , so [F4] supplies its unique least element. Ambient-isotopic representatives have the same crossing-count set by definition of the underlying unoriented link type. This makes well-defined.
Depends on
Used by
- Jones span detects crossing number for reduced alternating knots Corollary
- A nugatory kink defeats crossing minimality Counterexample
- The unknot defeats a universal coefficient-bound extension Counterexample
- A trefoil Jones–Vassiliev coefficient calculation Example
- Trefoil and figure-eight Jones spans Example
- Jones polynomial unknot-detection status Remark
- Reduced alternating diagrams minimize crossing number Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Danny Calegari, Introduction to Knot Theory, §1.9, printed pp. 7–8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- William W. Menasco and Morwen B. Thistlethwaite, The classification of alternating links, Annals of Mathematics 138 (1993), pp. 113–171 (standard reference, not scraped)