Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reduced alternating diagrams minimize crossing number

Statement

Assume ACω. Every connected reduced alternating diagram D of an oriented link L realizes the crossing number of its underlying unoriented link: c(D)=c(L).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, an oriented link L, and a connected reduced alternating diagram D representing it.

[A1]

ACω selects from every countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The crossing number is the least crossing count among regular diagrams of the underlying unoriented link (Crossing number of a link).

[F2]

A nonempty disconnected projection represents a split link (A disconnected link projection represents a split link).

[F3]

A connected alternating diagram represents a nonsplit link (Connected alternating diagrams represent nonsplit links).

[F4]

Every nonempty connected reduced alternating diagram has bracket span 4c(D), and every nonempty connected diagram E has bracket span at most 4c(E) (Connected-diagram bracket span bound and alternating equality).

[F5]

The normalized bracket is an invariant of nonempty oriented links under ACω; it multiplies the raw bracket by a Laurent monomial (The normalized bracket is an oriented link invariant).

[F6]

A reduced alternating diagram is connected and alternating by definition (Reduced alternating link diagram).

Proof

1.1givenF1cases

If D is empty, it has zero crossings. It is a regular diagram of L, so [F1] gives 0≤c(L)≤c(D)=0, proving the claim in this case without evaluating a bracket. Henceforth D and the represented link L are nonempty.

2.1givenF2F3F6step 1.1choosecontradiction

Let E be any regular diagram representing the same underlying unoriented link type as L. Since L is nonempty, so is E. If its projection were disconnected, [F2] would make L split, contradicting [F3] applied to D and [F6]. Hence every competing diagram E is connected. Orient each component of E so an ambient isotopy to L preserves its orientation.

3.1A1F4F5step 2.1algebra

By [F4], span⁡A⟨D⟩=4c(D) and span⁡A⟨E⟩≤4c(E). The normalized bracket multiplies each raw bracket by a monomial, which shifts all exponents equally and preserves span. By [A1] and [F5], the normalized bracket values for the nonempty oriented diagrams D and E agree. Therefore 4c(D)≤4c(E) and c(D)≤c(E).

4.1F1step 3.1choose∎

The diagram D is one of the regular diagrams in the nonempty crossing-count set of [F1], so c(L)≤c(D). Step 3.1 shows that c(D) is no larger than any member of that set, and therefore c(D)≤c(L). Combining the inequalities proves c(D)=c(L).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources