How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Convergence in L^1(mu) has an almost-everywhere convergent subsequence
Statement
Let be a measure space and let be measurable with . If in , then some subsequence of converges to -almost everywhere.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A measure space , measurable real-valued integrable functions , and convergence of to in .
Convergence in implies convergence in measure. (Convergence in L^1(mu) implies convergence in measure)
Convergence in measure has a subsequence converging almost everywhere to the same limit. (Riesz's subsequence theorem for convergence in measure)
Proof
By [L1], the sequence converges to in measure.
Apply [L2] to step 1.1. The resulting subsequence converges to almost everywhere.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Corollary 2.32 (standard reference, not scraped)