Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Convergence in L^1(mu) implies convergence in measure

Statement

Let (X,A,μ) be a measure space and let fn,f:X→R be measurable with fn,f∈L1(μ). If fn→f in L1(μ), then fn→f in measure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A measure space (X,A,μ), measurable real-valued integrable functions fn,f∈L1(μ), and convergence of (fn) to f in L1(μ).

[L1]

Convergence in L1(μ) means ∫∣fn−f∣ dμ→0. (Convergence in L^1(mu))

[L2]

Convergence in measure means that for every real ε>0, μ({∣fn−f∣>ε})→0. (Convergence in measure)

[L3]

For a nonnegative measurable function h and a real t>0, μ({h≥t})≤t−1∫h dμ. (Chebyshev-Markov inequality for the integral)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3algebra

Fix ε>0. Applying [L3] to h:=∣fn−f∣ and t:=ε gives μ({∣fn−f∣≥ε})≤ε−1∫∣fn−f∣ dμ for every n.

2.1step 1.1L1L2∎

By [L1], the right-hand side in step 1.1 tends to 0 as n→∞. Hence μ({∣fn−f∣>ε})→0 for every ε>0, which is exactly [L2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources