How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Convergence in L^1(mu) implies convergence in measure
Statement
Let be a measure space and let be measurable with . If in , then in measure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A measure space , measurable real-valued integrable functions , and convergence of to in .
Convergence in means . (Convergence in L^1(mu))
Convergence in measure means that for every real , . (Convergence in measure)
For a nonnegative measurable function and a real , . (Chebyshev-Markov inequality for the integral)
Proof
Fix . Applying [L3] to and gives for every .
By [L1], the right-hand side in step 1.1 tends to as . Hence for every , which is exactly [L2].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Proposition 2.29 (standard reference, not scraped)