How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vitali convergence theorem on finite and sigma-finite measure spaces
Statement
Let be a measure space, let be measurable with for every , and let be measurable.
- If , then in if and only if in measure and the family is uniformly integrable.
- If is sigma-finite and in measure, and the family is uniformly integrable and tight, then and in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integrable real-valued functions and a measurable .
Convergence in measure means that for every real , . (Convergence in measure)
Convergence in means . (Convergence in L^1(mu))
On a finite measure space, uniform integrability is equivalent to -boundedness plus uniform absolute continuity. (On a finite measure space, uniform integrability is equivalent to L^1-boundedness plus uniform absolute continuity)
Convergence in implies convergence in measure. (Convergence in L^1(mu) implies convergence in measure)
Convergence in measure has a subsequence converging almost everywhere. (Riesz's subsequence theorem for convergence in measure)
If and , then there is such that . (Absolute continuity of the integral)
For nonnegative measurable functions , . (Fatou's lemma)
A family is tight when for every there is a measurable set of finite measure such that . (A tight family of integrable functions)
Proof
Assume and in . By [L4], the sequence converges to in measure. To prove uniform integrability, it suffices by [L3] to show -boundedness and uniform absolute continuity. For -boundedness, choose so that for . Then for , and the finitely many initial terms may be absorbed into one larger bound.
Still on a finite measure space, assume in measure and the family is uniformly integrable. By [L3], the family is -bounded and uniformly absolutely continuous on small sets. By [L5], some subsequence converges to almost everywhere. Fatou's lemma [L7] then gives so .
Still under step 1.1, let . Choose so that for . Apply [L6] to and to the finitely many functions , and let be the minimum of the resulting positive numbers. Then implies for every , while for one has So [L3] yields uniform integrability.
Let . Choose such that implies both and ; the first uses step 1.2 together with [L3], and the second uses [L6]. Choose with . Since in measure, there is such that for , where . Then for , So in .
Assume now that is sigma-finite, that in measure, and that the family is uniformly integrable and tight. Let . By [L8], choose a measurable set with and Because in measure on , the restricted sequence converges in measure on as well, and uniform integrability persists on . Therefore step 2.2 applied on the finite measure space gives and . By [L5], after passing to a subsequence if necessary we may assume almost everywhere on . Applying [L7] to the nonnegative functions gives Hence . For all large one has , and then So in .
Step 1.1 proves the forward finite implication, steps 1.2 and 2.2 prove the reverse finite implication, and step 3.1 proves the sigma-finite tight form.
Depends on
- Convergence in measure
- Convergence in L^1(mu)
- A uniformly integrable family
- A tight family of integrable functions
- Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures
- Convergence in L^1(mu) implies convergence in measure
- On a finite measure space, uniform integrability is equivalent to L^1-boundedness plus uniform absolute continuity
- Riesz's subsequence theorem for convergence in measure
- Absolute continuity of the integral
- Fatou's lemma
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Terence Tao, 245A Notes 4: Modes of convergence, Theorem 29 (standard reference, not scraped)
- H. L. Royden and P. M. Fitzpatrick, Real Analysis, 4th ed., The Vitali Convergence Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard F. Bass, Real Analysis for Graduate Students, Exercise 7.22 (standard reference, not scraped)