Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local normal form for immersions

Statement

Let F:Mm→Nn be a smooth immersion at p∈M. Then there are charts near p and F(p) in which the coordinate representative of F is

u⟼(u,0)

near the distinguished point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth map F:Mm→Nn that is an immersion at p.

[L1]

The immersion locus is open (The immersion and submersion loci are open).

[L2]

A constant-rank-m map has local normal form (u,v)↦(u,0) (The constant-rank theorem for manifolds).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

Because F is an immersion at p, the linear map dFp:TpM→TF(p)N is injective. Its domain has dimension m, so its rank is m. Therefore [L1] supplies a neighbourhood of p on which F has constant rank m.

2.1step 1.1L2

Apply [L2] with r=m. The source has no normal coordinates left, so the local model is exactly u↦(u,0).

3.1step 2.1∎

This is the asserted immersion normal form.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources