How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Mass conservation for compactly supported entropy solutions
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain) for the heat-kernel, completeness and vanishing-viscosity extraction interfaces used below. Let , let be with , let be compactly supported, and let be the entropy solution of Existence of bounded Kruzhkov entropy solutions. Then for almost every , and the function is constant on after choosing the continuous representative of the orbit (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The space as the quotient by null functions).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable and Dependent Choice, , a flux with , a compactly supported datum with , the entropy solution of Existence of bounded Kruzhkov entropy solutions with its representative in , and a centre , with almost everywhere outside .
Existence and regularity: is a bounded Kruzhkov entropy solution with almost everywhere, for every , strong local trace , and an -continuous representative (Existence of bounded Kruzhkov entropy solutions, Kruzhkov entropy solutions).
Finite propagation: with , the solution and the zero solution (which is a Kruzhkov entropy solution with datum ) agree outside the cone: almost everywhere outside for almost every ; the conclusion is an almost-everywhere statement at the level of the classes (Finite propagation for scalar conservation laws, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).
Weak formulation: for every (Distributional weak solutions of the Cauchy problem, Kruzhkov entropy solutions).
There is a smooth compactly supported with on a neighbourhood of (Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs), and functions are equivalence classes, so pointwise statements on full-measure sets determine the class (The space as the quotient by null functions).
Proof
The cone support holds at every time for the chosen representative. By [F2] there is a full-measure set with almost everywhere outside for . Fix , and a compact set . The positive distance of from lets us choose with and for all ; then in , and the -continuity of the representative [F1] gives in . A countable exhaustion of the strict exterior of by compact sets gives almost everywhere there; hence for every , is supported in .
Truncated mass balance. By step 1.1, for every the function vanishes almost everywhere outside the fixed ball ; in particular at every time with , and the continuity of [F1] is continuity in . Choose as in [F4] and, for , test [F3] with : since is supported where and implies wherever , the flux term vanishes and only flat boundary terms contribute. The divergence theorem in the form of the weak identity then gives for the function , that is, in the sense of distributions on .
Conclusion. Since is continuous in on and the support lies in the fixed ball, is continuous on ; its distributional derivative vanishes on by step 2.1 and by the strong trace. To see constancy directly, convolve locally in time with a smooth unit-mass bump: its derivative is zero by tested against translated kernels, so FTC makes each convolution constant on every interior compact interval. Uniform continuity of on such intervals makes the convolutions converge uniformly to , hence is constant on and by continuity at its endpoints. Therefore for every ; in particular the equality holds for almost every and the chosen representative makes constant on every . As was arbitrary, the claims follow on .
Depends on
- Existence of bounded Kruzhkov entropy solutions
- Kruzhkov entropy solutions
- Finite propagation for scalar conservation laws
- Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space
- Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Distributional weak solutions of the Cauchy problem
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. N. Kruzhkov, “First order quasilinear equations in several independent variables,” Mat. USSR-Sbornik 10 (1970), 217–243, complete English translation (standard reference, not scraped)
- G. A. Chechkin and A. Yu. Goritsky (translated by B. Andreianov), “S. N. Kruzhkov’s lectures on first-order quasilinear PDEs,” in Analytical and Numerical Aspects of PDEs, de Gruyter 2009, complete lecture-notes text (standard reference, not scraped)