Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Mass conservation for compactly supported entropy solutions

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain) for the heat-kernel, L1 completeness and vanishing-viscosity extraction interfaces used below. Let n≥1, let f ⁣:R→Rn be C1 with f(0)=0, let u0∈L1(Rn)∩L∞(Rn) be compactly supported, and let u be the entropy solution of Existence of bounded Kruzhkov entropy solutions. Then ∫Rnu(t,x) dx=∫Rnu0(x) dx for almost every t≥0, and the function t↦∫u(t,x) dx is constant on [0,∞) after choosing the continuous representative of the L1 orbit (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable and Dependent Choice, n≥1, a C1 flux f with f(0)=0, a compactly supported datum u0∈L1∩L∞ with M=∥u0∥∞, the entropy solution u of Existence of bounded Kruzhkov entropy solutions with its representative in C0([0,T];Lloc1), and a centre x0∈Rn, R>0 with u0=0 almost everywhere outside B(x0,R).

[F1]

Existence and regularity: u is a bounded Kruzhkov entropy solution with ∣u∣≤M almost everywhere, ∥u(t,⋅)∥∞≤M for every t, strong local L1 trace u0, and an Lloc1-continuous representative (Existence of bounded Kruzhkov entropy solutions, Kruzhkov entropy solutions).

[F2]

Finite propagation: with L=sup⁡∣s∣≤M∣f′(s)∣, the solution u and the zero solution (which is a Kruzhkov entropy solution with datum 0) agree outside the cone: u(t,⋅)=0 almost everywhere outside B(x0,R+Lt) for almost every t≥0; the conclusion is an almost-everywhere statement at the level of the L1 classes (Finite propagation for scalar conservation laws, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

[F3]

Weak formulation: ∫ΠT(uφt+f(u)⋅∇φ)=0 for every φ∈Cc∞(ΠT) (Distributional weak solutions of the Cauchy problem, Kruzhkov entropy solutions).

[F4]

There is a smooth compactly supported β with β=1 on a neighbourhood of B‾(x0,R+LT) (Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs), and L1 functions are equivalence classes, so pointwise statements on full-measure sets determine the class (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

The cone support holds at every time for the chosen representative. By [F2] there is a full-measure set E⊆(0,∞) with u(t)=0 almost everywhere outside B(x0,R+Lt) for t∈E. Fix T>0, t0∈[0,T] and a compact set K⊆{x:∣x−x0∣>R+Lt0}. The positive distance of K from B‾(x0,R+Lt0) lets us choose tj∈E∩(0,T) with tj→t0 and K⊆{x:∣x−x0∣>R+Ltj} for all j; then u(tj)=0 in L1(K), and the Lloc1-continuity of the representative [F1] gives u(t0)=0 in L1(K). A countable exhaustion of the strict exterior of B(x0,R+Lt0) by compact sets gives u(t0)=0 almost everywhere there; hence for every t0∈[0,T], u(t0) is supported in B‾(x0,R+Lt0)⊆B‾(x0,R+LT).

2.1F3F4step 1.1

Truncated mass balance. By step 1.1, for every t∈[0,T] the function u(t,⋅) vanishes almost everywhere outside the fixed ball B(x0,R+LT); in particular u∈L1 at every time with ∥u(t)∥1≤M vol(B(x0,R+LT)), and the Lloc1 continuity of [F1] is continuity in L1(Rn). Choose β as in [F4] and, for ψ∈Cc∞((0,T)), test [F3] with φ(t,x)=ψ(t)β(x): since u(t,⋅) is supported where β=1 and f(0)=0 implies f(u)=0 wherever u=0, the flux term vanishes and only flat boundary terms contribute. The divergence theorem in the form of the weak identity then gives ∫0Tψ′(t) m(t) dt=0 for the function m(t)=∫Rnu(t,x) dx, that is, m′=0 in the sense of distributions on (0,T).

3.1F1F4step 1.1step 2.1∎

Conclusion. Since u is continuous in L1 on [0,T] and the support lies in the fixed ball, m is continuous on [0,T]; its distributional derivative vanishes on (0,T) by step 2.1 and m(0)=∫u0 by the strong L1 trace. To see constancy directly, convolve m locally in time with a smooth unit-mass bump: its derivative is zero by m′=0 tested against translated kernels, so FTC makes each convolution constant on every interior compact interval. Uniform continuity of m on such intervals makes the convolutions converge uniformly to m, hence m is constant on (0,T) and by continuity at its endpoints. Therefore m(t)=∫u0 for every t∈[0,T]; in particular the equality holds for almost every t and the chosen representative makes t↦∫u(t,x) dx constant on every [0,T]. As T>0 was arbitrary, the claims follow on [0,∞).

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources