Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conditional convergence of the diagonal-diffusion scheme under comparison

Statement

For a sequence of diagonal-diffusion grid schemes satisfying the hypotheses of Half-relaxed limits of the monotone diagonal-diffusion HJB scheme, suppose in addition that the exact periodic Cauchy problem Periodic diagonal controlled-diffusion HJB Cauchy problem has a comparison principle for bounded upper semicontinuous subsolutions and bounded lower semicontinuous supersolutions with ordered relaxed initial traces. Then the upper and lower half-relaxed limits coincide, define the unique bounded continuous viscosity solution, and the spatially interpolated numerical solutions converge locally uniformly on Td×[0,T) to it. This corollary is conditional on the stated second-order comparison property; it does not supply or assert that property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The half-relaxed stability statement and the comparison hypothesis in the corollary.

[F1]

The upper limit is a bounded USC subsolution and the lower limit is a bounded LSC supersolution with the same initial data, and U‾≤U‾ (Half-relaxed limits of the monotone diagonal-diffusion HJB scheme).

[A1]

The stated comparison principle applies to this periodic coefficient class for the bounded semicontinuous sub- and supersolutions in [F1], with their relaxed initial ordering. This is an explicit conditional hypothesis, not a result proved on this page (Periodic diagonal controlled-diffusion HJB Cauchy problem, Second-order parabolic viscosity subsolutions and supersolutions).

[F2]

The set definitions of the relaxed limits imply that if both envelopes equal a continuous function on a compact set, then a finite subcover of nearby upper and lower bounds proves uniform convergence there (Half-relaxed limits of a locally bounded family, Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line).

Proof

1.1A1F1algebra

Apply [A1] to the upper subsolution and lower supersolution supplied by [F1]. Their common initial trace gives the required ordering, hence U‾≤U‾. Together with the reverse inequality in [F1], this proves equality.

2.1A1F1step 1.1

The common function is both upper and lower semicontinuous by [F1], hence continuous. It is both a viscosity subsolution and supersolution, so is a viscosity solution with the prescribed initial data. Comparison in [A1] implies uniqueness.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

Fix T′<T and let K=[0,1]d×[0,T′] in the periodic lift; this box is compact by Heine--Borel. Write u for the common limit from step 2.1 and fix ε>0. For z∈K and rational q>0, include B(z,q/2) in a family when for every integer k with 1/k<q and every y with ∣y−z∣<q, ∣Vk(y)−u(z)∣<ε/3, and continuity gives ∣u(y)−u(z)∣<ε/3. The set definitions in [F2] guarantee that these balls cover K: each point has a positive real radius, and a smaller rational radius works. The family consists of all qualifying pairs, so no radius is selected point by point. By [F2], a finite subcover exists; take the least of its finitely many rational radii. The triangle inequality then gives ∣Vk(y)−u(y)∣<2ε/3<ε uniformly on K for all sufficiently large k. This proves uniform convergence on the fundamental box through T′, hence on the torus and every compact subset of Td×[0,T). Thus the extensions converge locally uniformly.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources