Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Half-relaxed limits of a locally bounded family

Definition

Let U⊆Rm be open (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement) and let (uε)ε∈(0,1) be a family of real-valued functions on U that is locally bounded: for every compact K⊆U there is MK<∞ with ∣uε(y)∣≤MK for all ε∈(0,1) and y∈K. The upper half-relaxed limit and the lower half-relaxed limit of the family, computed in R‾ (The extended real line R‾=R∪{−∞,+∞}, its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined, Greatest lower bound (infimum), Epsilon characterisation of the supremum), are u‾(z):=lim sup⁡ε↓0U∋y→zuε(y):=inf⁡δ>0 sup⁡{uε(y):0<ε<δ, y∈U, ∣y−z∣<δ}, u‾(z):=lim inf⁡ε↓0U∋y→zuε(y):=sup⁡δ>0 inf⁡{uε(y):0<ε<δ, y∈U, ∣y−z∣<δ}. The quantifiers range over the index ε and the point y simultaneously, so the limit records the behaviour of the whole family near z, not the limit of the single family of values (uε(z))ε; both envelopes are local and depend only on the germ of the family at z.

Remarks

  • Basic properties. If the family converges locally uniformly on U to a continuous function u, then u‾=u‾=u. If the family is only locally bounded, then u‾≤u‾ pointwise, and u‾ is upper semicontinuous while u‾ is lower semicontinuous on U: the expressions are again monotone limits of local suprema and infima over families, and the proof of The envelopes are the least upper and greatest lower semicontinuous functions applies verbatim with the family indexed by δ. Every value is kept in R‾; local boundedness makes both envelopes real-valued on each compact subset of U.
  • Why the joint limit. Under Countable Choice, there are pairs (εj,yj)→(0,z) with uεj(yj)→u‾(z), and likewise for u‾(z). For finite lower limit, take the infima over 0<ε<1/j, ∣y−z∣<1/j and choose a point within 1/j of each infimum; these infima increase to u‾(z). The upper case is dual, with suprema decreasing to u‾(z). Infinite values use diverging finite thresholds. The definition itself is set-based and selects no subsequence or point; only this sequential characterization uses Countable Choice. This is the limit notion consumed by Half-relaxed limits of sub- and supersolutions with vanishing perturbations.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources