How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Half-relaxed limits of a locally bounded family
Definition
Let be open (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement) and let be a family of real-valued functions on that is locally bounded: for every compact there is with for all and . The upper half-relaxed limit and the lower half-relaxed limit of the family, computed in (The extended real line , its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined, Greatest lower bound (infimum), Epsilon characterisation of the supremum), are The quantifiers range over the index and the point simultaneously, so the limit records the behaviour of the whole family near , not the limit of the single family of values ; both envelopes are local and depend only on the germ of the family at .
Remarks
- Basic properties. If the family converges locally uniformly on to a continuous function , then . If the family is only locally bounded, then pointwise, and is upper semicontinuous while is lower semicontinuous on : the expressions are again monotone limits of local suprema and infima over families, and the proof of The envelopes are the least upper and greatest lower semicontinuous functions applies verbatim with the family indexed by . Every value is kept in ; local boundedness makes both envelopes real-valued on each compact subset of .
- Why the joint limit. Under Countable Choice, there are pairs with , and likewise for . For finite lower limit, take the infima over , and choose a point within of each infimum; these infima increase to . The upper case is dual, with suprema decreasing to . Infinite values use diverging finite thresholds. The definition itself is set-based and selects no subsequence or point; only this sequential characterization uses Countable Choice. This is the limit notion consumed by Half-relaxed limits of sub- and supersolutions with vanishing perturbations.
Depends on
- The extended real line $\overline{\mathbb{R}} = \mathbb{R} \cup \{-\infty, +\infty\}$, its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined
- The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
- Greatest lower bound (infimum)
- Epsilon characterisation of the supremum
- The envelopes are the least upper and greatest lower semicontinuous functions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.