Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Half-relaxed limits of the monotone diagonal-diffusion HJB scheme

Statement

Let hk,j→0, τk=T/Mk→0, and let Uk be the finite solutions of Explicit monotone diagonal-diffusion Bellman grid update with its diffusion-dominance and CFL inequalities at every row. Extend each array multilinearly in space, constantly on each time interval, and by its initial interpolant for −1<t<0; identify the mesh sequence with the parameter family convention of Half-relaxed limits of a locally bounded family. Its upper half-relaxed limit is a bounded upper semicontinuous viscosity subsolution, and its lower half-relaxed limit is a bounded lower semicontinuous viscosity supersolution of the periodic diagonal-diffusion Cauchy problem, with the respective relaxed initial inequalities equal to u0. This is a stability statement only; it does not claim that the two limits coincide.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The scheme, its finite horizon and mesh assumptions in the statement, and a smooth test function at a strict interior contact.

[F1]

Every fixed-control row is order-preserving and commutes with constant shifts. Its nonnegative weights sum to one; therefore the max update is order-preserving and changes the sup norm by at most τkF (Nonnegative row weights for the diagonal-diffusion HJB stencil, Explicit monotone diagonal-diffusion Bellman grid update).

[F2]

The normalized smooth-test residual tends uniformly on compact sets to ϕt−max⁡a{∑j(αjaϕxjxj+bjaϕxj)+fa} as hk,max⁡,τk→0 (Smooth consistency of the diagonal-diffusion Bellman stencil).

[F3]

Strict upper/lower contacts of the half-relaxed limits localize to nodal maxima/minima on a fixed cylinder, with nodes converging to the contact (Localization of strict half-relaxed contacts to periodic mesh nodes).

[F4]

For this operator, smooth tests suffice to establish the viscosity inequality for all C1,2 tests (Smooth test functions suffice for the first- and second-order HJB viscosity notions).

[F5]

The initial nodal values converge uniformly to u0 as tn→0 for this scheme (Initial trace for the explicit diagonal-diffusion HJB scheme).

[F6]

The half-relaxed limits are the set-defined USC/LSC envelopes of the locally bounded interpolant family and satisfy U‾≤U‾ (Half-relaxed limits of a locally bounded family).

[A1]

Countable Choice is used only through [F3] and the sequential recovery form of [F6] (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

1.1F1F6givenalgebra

The row weights in [F1] give ∥Ukn∥∞≤∥u0∥∞+nτkF≤∥u0∥∞+TF. Multilinear interpolation is a convex combination, so the same bound holds for the space-time extensions. They are locally bounded and their half-relaxed limits have the semicontinuity and order properties in [F6].

2.1A1F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Let U‾−ϕ have a local maximum at (x0,t0), with 0<t0<T and smooth ϕ. Add ε(∣x−x0∣4+∣t−t0∣4) to ϕ; this makes the contact strict without changing its derivatives used by the PDE at (x0,t0), as in [F4]. Select nodal local maxima (xk,tk) from [F3] and put ck=Uiknk−ϕ(xk,tk). All coordinate neighbors used by the explicit stencil at the previous time lie in the fixed contact cylinder for sufficiently large k, because their distance to (xk,tk) is at most hk,max⁡+τk. Thus Ujnk−1≤ϕ(xj,tk−τk)+ck at every stencil node. Monotonicity and shift invariance in [F1] give Uiknk=Sk(Unk−1)ik≤Sk(ϕ(⋅,tk−τk)+ck)ik=Sk(ϕ(⋅,tk−τk))ik+ck. At the contact node Uiknk=ϕ(xk,tk)+ck, so the normalized residual is nonpositive. Passing to the limit by [F2] yields ϕt−max⁡a{∑j(αjaϕxjxj+bjaϕxj)+fa}≤0 at (x0,t0).

2.2A1F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

At a local minimum of U‾−ϕ, subtract ε(∣x−x0∣4+∣t−t0∣4) from ϕ to make the contact strict without changing its tested derivatives, as in [F4]. The minimizing nodes in [F3] give Ujnk−1≥ϕ(xj,tk−τk)+ck on the stencil. Order preservation reverses the update inequality, so the residual is nonnegative and its limit gives the supersolution inequality. By [F4], both inequalities extend from smooth tests to all tests in the declared C1,2 class.

3.1F5F6step 1.1algebra∎

The initial-trace estimate [F5] and uniform continuity of u0 show that every space-time sequence with mesh tending to zero and time tending to zero has values tending to u0 at its limiting spatial point; the spatial interpolation adds at most the modulus of u0 at distance d hk,max⁡. Therefore the upper and lower relaxed limits both have the prescribed relaxed initial trace. Boundedness and semicontinuity were proved in step 1.1, completing the stability statement.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources