Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Convergence of the positive-interpolation and upwind first-order HJB schemes

Statement

Let u0 and the coefficients satisfy Periodic first-order controlled Hamilton–Jacobi Cauchy problem. Consider a sequence of periodic grids with hk,max⁡→0, time steps τk=T/Mk→0, Mk∈N, and finite nonempty control sets Ak⊆A whose Hamiltonian errors ηk(R) tend to zero for each finite R. For the positive-interpolation scheme additionally assume hk,max⁡2/τk→0. For the upwind scheme assume its CFL condition at every step. Extend the initial interpolant constantly for −1<t<0 and identify the mesh sequence with the parameter family Vϵ=Vk for (k+1)−1<ϵ≤k−1 in Half-relaxed limits of a locally bounded family. Then the respective piecewise multilinear-in-space, piecewise-constant-in-time extensions of the nodal solutions converge locally uniformly on Td×[0,T) to the same bounded continuous viscosity solution of the Cauchy problem. This conclusion includes exact finite-control models (Ak=A), where ηk=0. The proof does not assert a rate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: One of the two scheme families and mesh conditions in the statement. Let Vk denote its spatially multilinear and temporally piecewise-constant periodic extension on Rd×(−1,T), initialized as in the statement for −1<t<0.

[F1]

Each update is order-preserving and commutes with adding a constant to all nodal values; it is bounded by the preceding sup norm plus τkL. Its smooth-test residual is ϕt+H+o(1), uniformly on compact test sets, with the respective conditions hk,max⁡2/τk→0 or CFL and with ηk(P)→0 (Monotonicity, L-infinity stability, and consistency of the semi-Lagrangian HJB step, Monotonicity, L-infinity stability, and consistency of the upwind HJB step).

[F2]

For any locally bounded family, the set-defined upper and lower half-relaxed limits are respectively upper and lower semicontinuous, satisfy V‾≤V‾, and have sequential recovery pairs under Countable Choice (Half-relaxed limits of a locally bounded family, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F3]

A strict upper (respectively lower) half-relaxed contact by a smooth test localizes to nodal local maxima (respectively minima) on a fixed space-time ball; the localizing nodes converge to the contact and their values recover the envelope (Localization of strict half-relaxed contacts to periodic mesh nodes).

[F4]

Testing a subsolution or supersolution with smooth tests is equivalent to testing with all C1 tests for this first-order equation (Smooth test functions suffice for the first- and second-order HJB viscosity notions).

[F5]

The periodic HJB Hamiltonian obeys ∣H(x,t,p)−H(y,s,p)∣≤L(1+∣p∣)(∣x−y∣+∣t−s∣),∣H(x,t,p)−H(x,t,q)∣≤B∣p−q∣, so with C=max⁡{1,L,B} it satisfies the positive-constant whole-space comparison bounds and comparison applies to bounded USC subsolutions and bounded LSC supersolutions on the periodic lift when their initial traces are ordered (Periodic first-order controlled Hamilton–Jacobi Cauchy problem, Comparison for first-order Hamilton--Jacobi equations).

[F6]

For the semi-Lagrangian branch the nodal values approach u0 uniformly as tn→0 under hk,max⁡2/τk→0; for the upwind branch the same holds under its CFL condition (Initial trace for the positive-interpolation and upwind HJB schemes).

[F7]

The convex interpolation weights give ∣Ihku0(x)−u0(x)∣≤ω0(d hk,max⁡) for a modulus ω0(δ)→0, by uniform continuity of the periodic initial data (Positive partition of unity and interpolation error for periodic multilinear interpolation, Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous).

[A1]

Countable Choice is used in [F2] and [F3] only to select near-recovery pairs and contradiction subsequences; no choice is used in any finite row calculation (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

By the stability part of [F1] and Mkτk=T, all nodal values satisfy ∥Ukn∥∞≤∥u0∥∞+Ltn≤∥u0∥∞+LT. The convex interpolation weights give the same bound for Vk, so the family is locally bounded on Td×[0,T). Form its upper and lower half-relaxed limits V‾,V‾ as in [F2].

2.1A1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Let V‾−ϕ have a local maximum at an interior point (x0,t0), with ϕ smooth. Add ε(∣x−x0∣4+∣t−t0∣4) to ϕ; this makes the contact strict without changing its first derivatives at (x0,t0), as in [F4]. Choose the nodal local maxima (xk,tk) in [F3], with (xk,tk)→(x0,t0); write ck=Uiknk−ϕ(xk,tk). For all sufficiently large k, every node used by the previous-time update at (xk,tk) lies inside the fixed contact ball: the upwind neighbors are at distance at most hk,max⁡ and each semi-Lagrangian interpolation vertex is at distance at most τkB+d hk,max⁡. Hence each such previous-layer nodal value satisfies Ujnk−1≤ϕ(xj,tk−τk)+ck. Order preservation and constant-shift invariance from [F1] imply Uiknk=Sk(Unk−1)ik≤Sk(ϕ(⋅,tk−τk)+ck)ik=Sk(ϕ(⋅,tk−τk))ik+ck. Since Uiknk=ϕ(xk,tk)+ck, the normalized residual is nonpositive. Taking k→∞ and using the consistency estimate in [F1] gives ϕt(x0,t0)+H(x0,t0,Dϕ(x0,t0))≤0. By [F4], V‾ is a viscosity subsolution for the full C1 test class.

2.2A1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

At a local minimum of V‾−ϕ, subtract ε(∣x−x0∣4+∣t−t0∣4) from ϕ to make the contact strict without changing its derivatives at (x0,t0), as in [F4]. Use the minimizing nodes in [F3]. All previous-layer stencil nodes lie in the contact ball, so Ujnk−1≥ϕ(xj,tk−τk)+ck. Order preservation and constant-shift invariance now yield the reverse update inequality, hence the normalized consistency residual is nonnegative. Passing to the limit gives the viscosity supersolution inequality. The smooth-test equivalence [F4] extends it to every C1 lower test.

2.3F2F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

The initial trace estimate [F6] and the interpolation error [F7] show that both half-relaxed limits equal u0 on t=0. They are bounded by step 1.1 and have the required semicontinuity by [F2]. Apply comparison [F5] to the periodic lifts of V‾ and V‾: it gives V‾≤V‾. The reverse inequality is part of [F2], so they coincide with a continuous viscosity solution having initial data u0.

3.1F2F8step 2.3algebra∎

Fix T′<T and let K=[0,1]d×[0,T′] in the periodic lift; it is compact by [F8]. Fix ε>0 and write u for the common continuous limit from step 2.3. For z∈K and q∈Q>0, put P(z,q) when the set-defined upper and lower envelopes in [F2] give ∣Vk(y)−u(z)∣≤ε/3for every integer k with 1/k<q and every y with ∣y−z∣<q, and continuity gives ∣u(y)−u(z)∣<ε/3 whenever ∣y−z∣<q. The family of all balls {B(z,q/2):z∈K, q∈Q>0, P(z,q)} covers K: each point has a positive real radius from the two envelope definitions and continuity, and a smaller rational radius still works. This is the family of all qualifying pairs, so no radius is selected for every point. By [F8] take a finite subcover and let q∗>0 be its least radius. For 1/k<q∗, every y∈K lies in one of these balls and therefore ∣Vk(y)−u(y)∣<2ε/3<ε. This proves uniform convergence on the fundamental box through T′, hence on the torus and every compact subset of Td×[0,T).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources