Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

P1/R3 practical DPG quasi-optimality and residual estimator for Poisson

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let Ω⊂R2 be any bounded connected Lipschitz polygon, including polygons with holes, and let Th be any finite conforming shape-regular triangular mesh. Use the exact two-dimensional P1/R3 practical family selected in PE30: volume fields σh∣K∈P1(K)2 and uh∣K∈P1(K); compatible global scalar traces of degree at most two on facets, zero on boundary facets; conservative global normal traces of degree at most one; and broken tests Vr=∏K(P3(K)2×P3(K)), with the graph inner product inherited from V. The local Fortin projection Π:V→Vr is that of A uniformly bounded Fortin map for the practical P1/R3 DPG family, and CΠ is its operator norm bound. For each f∈L2(Ω), the continuous ultraweak solution x and practical solution xh exist uniquely, with ∥x−xh∥U≤(1+5CΠC∗)inf⁡zh∈Uh∥x−zh∥U. For every x~h∈Uh, put η=∥Ff−Bx~h∥Vr′, where Vr′ is the dual of Vr with its induced norm, and osc⁡(Ff)=∥Ff∘(I−Π)∥V′. Then C∗−2∥x−x~h∥U2≤η2+(CΠη+osc⁡(Ff))2,η≤5∥x−x~h∥U, and osc⁡(Ff)≤Cosc(∑KhK2∥f−fK∥L2(K)2)1/2,fK=∣K∣−1∫Kf, where hK=diam⁡(K) and Cosc is the cellwise constant from the Fortin map's mean-preserving local L2 estimate. The constants C∗, CΠ, and Cosc are independent of mesh size for the fixed domain and shape-regular family. The practical corollary is two-dimensional; the continuous graph theorem also covers dimension three.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a bounded connected Lipschitz polygon, a finite conforming shape-regular triangular mesh, and f∈L2(Ω).

[A1]

Countable Choice is the hypothesis for the cited Hilbert and Riesz interfaces. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The continuous graph theorem gives bounded invertibility and primal and adjoint inf-sup constants at least C∗−1 on every connected Lipschitz polygon, with no simple-connectivity assumption. (Adjoint graph inf-sup for ultraweak Poisson on connected Lipschitz polyhedra)

[F2]

The local P1/R3 Fortin map applies on shape-regular triangular meshes, has ∥Π∥≤CΠ, preserves scalar cell means, and satisfies the local L2 approximation bound. (A uniformly bounded Fortin map for the practical P1/R3 DPG family)

[F3]

The DPG bilinear form is bounded with ∥b∥≤5. (The ultraweak Poisson DPG bilinear form is bounded)

[F4]

The conditional practical-DPG theorem gives a unique discrete solution and quasi-optimality under the stated continuous inf-sup and Fortin hypotheses. (Fortin stability and quasi-optimality for practical DPG)

[F5]

The conditional residual theorem gives reliability, efficiency and the Fortin data-oscillation estimate under the same hypotheses. (Practical DPG residual is reliable and efficient up to data oscillation)

[F6]

The load is Ff(τ,v)=(f,v), the test norm includes ∥v∥2, and the scalar skeleton trace is the trace of a global H01 field. (Ultraweak Poisson DPG spaces and plan-consistent bilinear form)

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3F4F6givenalgebra

Since ∥Ff∥V′≤∥f∥2, [F1] gives the unique continuous solution x=B−1Ff. The mesh and discrete spaces satisfy [F2] exactly: the dimension is two, the mesh is triangular, and the compatible scalar trace vanishes on boundary facets. Apply [F4] with β=C∗−1; using [F3] in its quasi-optimal constant gives the stated unique practical solution and factor 1+5CΠC∗. For f=0, both solutions are zero by these uniqueness conclusions.

2.1F1F2F3F5step 1.1algebra

For any x~h∈Uh, apply [F5] with the same β=C∗−1 and Fortin map [F2]. Its reliability and efficiency inequalities give C∗−2∥x−x~h∥U2≤η2+(CΠη+osc⁡(Ff))2,η≤∥b∥∥x−x~h∥U≤5∥x−x~h∥U.

3.1F2F6step 2.1algebra∎

For y=(τ,v), cell-mean preservation gives ∫K(v−Π3gradv)=0, hence Ff((I−Π)y)=∑K(f−fK,v−Π3gradv)K. The local approximation bound in [F2] and Cauchy–Schwarz over cells give the displayed Cosc estimate. In particular the oscillation is zero when f is cellwise constant. All constants depend on the fixed domain, polynomial degrees and mesh shape regularity, not on h; the graph proof makes no topological restriction, while this Fortin family is only the dimension-two branch.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources