How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The system is consistent if and only if
Statement
For every finite system over a field,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A coefficient matrix and augmented matrix .
Consistency is equivalent to absence of a pivot in the augmented column of the RREF (Reduced row echelon form detects consistency and parametrises every solution by the nonpivot variables).
Matrix rank equals the number of pivots (Row rank equals column rank, and both equal the number of pivots).
Proof
Row reduce the augmented matrix. Its coefficient block is an echelon form row equivalent to , while the whole reduced matrix is an echelon form of . Thus [L2] identifies their respective pivot counts with the two ranks. Those counts differ exactly when the augmented column supplies one additional pivot.
By [L1], absence of that additional augmented pivot is equivalent to consistency. Step 1.1 therefore proves both directions.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Hefferon, Linear Algebra, 4th ed., Ch. One, §III.2 (standard reference, not scraped)