How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The scalar line integral of one is the arc length
Statement
For every piecewise- path ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A piecewise- path , with an admissible partition when its parameter interval is nondegenerate.
On a nondegenerate interval, substituting in the scalar line-integral definition gives the sum of the speed integrals over the smooth pieces; on a singleton interval the scalar line integral is zero (Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals).
That sum of speed integrals equals the path length; on a singleton interval the empty sum and the length are both zero (A continuous piecewise- path is rectifiable and its length is the sum of the speed integrals over its pieces).
Proof
On a nondegenerate interval, [L1] gives
By [L2], the right-hand side of step 1.1 is .
On a singleton interval both sides are zero by [L1] and [L2]. A constant path on a nondegenerate interval has zero speed, so step 2.1 gives zero on both sides there as well.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 49 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, section 9.2 (standard reference, not scraped)