Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-09 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming dependent choice, a nonempty topological space is separated-uniformizable if and only if it is Tychonoff

Statement

Assuming dependent choice, a nonempty topological space is separated-uniformizable if and only if it is Tychonoff.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty topological space and dependent choice.

[L1]

Uniformizable is equivalent to completely regular under dependent choice (Assuming dependent choice, a nonempty topological space is uniformizable if and only if it is completely regular).

[L2]

A separated compatible uniformity induces a Hausdorff topology (A uniformity is separated if and only if its induced topology is Hausdorff).

[L4]

A completely regular topology is induced by the gauge pf(x,y)=∣f(x)−f(y)∣ over all continuous f:X→[0,1] (The topology of a nonempty completely regular space is induced by the gauge of its continuous [0,1]-valued pseudometrics, A gauge of pseudometrics and, on a nonempty set, the uniformity it generates).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A separated-uniformizable space is completely regular by [L1] and Hausdorff by [L2], hence T1 by [L5] and therefore Tychonoff by [L3].

L1L2L3L5
1.2

Conversely, let X be Tychonoff. For x≠y, the singleton {y} is closed by [L6], and complete regularity gives a continuous f:X→[0,1] with f(x)=1 and f(y)=0. Thus the gauge in [L4] has an entourage excluding (x,y), so its intersection is the diagonal and it is separated. It induces the original topology by [L4].

L3L4L6
2.1

Thus it is separated-uniformizable, proving the converse and the equivalence.

step 1.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources