Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-generation, torsion, and p-primary Serre transfer

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let FEpB be a Serre fibration over a CW complex with B and F simply connected, and let N0. For each of the properties P{finite, finitely generated, torsion, p-primary torsion}, if Hs(B;Z) and Ht(F;Z) have property P for 0<sN and 0<tN, then Hi(E;Z) has property P for every 0<iN.

There are two sharper edge forms.

  1. For torsion or p-primary torsion, if only Ht(F;Z) has the property for 0<tN, then p:Hi(E;Z)Hi(B;Z) has kernel and cokernel with that property for iN.
  2. For any of the four properties, if n2, the base groups have the property for 0<s<n, and the fiber groups have it for 0<t<n1, then Hi(E,F;Z)Hi(B,;Z) has kernel and cokernel with that property for in.

Finite and finitely generated groups enter the ring clauses, not the ideal clause in part 1. Torsion and p-primary torsion groups are Serre ideals.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the simply connected fibration, the degree bound, and one of the four displayed properties.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed for the UCT and balanced-Tor inputs below.

[F1]

Serre classes, Serre rings, ideals, and modulo-C morphisms gives the exact tensor-and-Tor definitions of Serre ring and ideal.

[F2]

The fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups from PID modules decomposes a finitely generated abelian group as a finite sum of Z and finite cyclic groups.

[F3]

Tor one of two cyclic abelian groups is cyclic of gcd order computes, under [A1], Tor1Z(Z/m,Z/n)=Z/gcd(m,n).

[F4]

Homological Serre spectral sequence gives Es,t2=Hs(B;Ht(F)) for the simply connected base and its finite abutment filtration.

[F5]

The universal coefficient theorem for homology over a PID gives the coefficient tensor-Tor exact sequence, with [A1] propagated from its actual freeness input.

[F6]

First-quadrant spectral-sequence transfer modulo a Serre class transfers a bounded E2 Serre-class region to the corresponding total homology groups.

[F7]

Serre-class transfer through a simply connected fibration gives the ideal edge clause and the relative ring clause with their exact ranges.

Proof

technique · verify the four closure classes and substitute them into the three exact transfer patterns
1.1

Subgroups, quotients, and extensions preserve finiteness, torsion, and p-primary torsion directly; for a torsion element in an extension, multiply first into the kernel and then kill it there. For finite generation, [F2] writes the ambient group as ZrT with T finite. A subgroup of Z is generated by its least positive element, and induction on coordinate projection shows every subgroup of Zr is finitely generated; adjoining the finite intersection with T proves the subgroup clause. Quotients preserve chosen generators, and lifts of finitely many quotient generators together with generators of the kernel prove extension closure. Thus each property defines a Serre class.

F1F2
1.2

By [F2], tensor products of two finite or finitely generated groups are finite or finitely generated. Additivity and [F3] give the same conclusion for Tor, since a free cyclic summand contributes zero Tor and two finite cyclic summands contribute a finite cyclic group. Hence these two classes are Serre rings. They are not ideals: for D=j0Z/2, the group (Z/2)DD is infinite, and ZDD is not finitely generated.

A1F1F2F3
1.3

If A is torsion and B arbitrary, every element of AB is a finite tensor sum and is killed by a common positive integer. If A is p-primary, a common power of p works. Resolving B and forming AP gives chain groups with the same property; their homology, including Tor1(A,B), retains it by subgroup and quotient closure. Therefore the torsion and p-primary classes are Serre ideals.

A1F1
2.1

Fix 0<iN. For s+t=i, the axes of [F4] are the supplied base or fiber groups. If s,t>0, [F5] expresses Es,t2 as an extension of Hs(B)Ht(F) by Tor1(Hs1(B),Ht(F)). When s=1, the latter term is zero because H0(B)=Z; otherwise both factors have the selected property. Steps 1.1–1.3 put both terms in the associated Serre class, and the axes are supplied directly: Es,02=Hs(B) and E0,t2=Ht(F) for s,t>0 by [F4]. Hence every E2 term with 1p+qN belongs to that class. The transfer argument of [F6] applies on this positive-total-degree region: the isolated term E0,02 has no outgoing differential in the first quadrant, so it contributes only to H0, while every finite filtration quotient of Hi(E) with i1 is a subquotient of an E2 term of total degree i and therefore lies in the class. Hence Hi(E;Z) has property P for every 0<iN.

A1F1F4F5F6step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3
2.2

For torsion and p-primary torsion, step 1.3 supplies precisely the Serre-ideal hypothesis of clause 1 in [F7]. Substitution gives sharp edge form 1 with only the fiber-range assumption. For all four classes, steps 1.1–1.3 supply the Serre-ring hypothesis of clause 2 in [F7]; substitution with its displayed base and fiber ranges gives sharp edge form 2. The counterexamples in step 1.2 explain why the finite and finitely generated cases are not inserted into the ideal conclusion.

F1F7step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3
3.1

For N=0 the positive-degree total-space assertion is empty and edge form 1 is the ordinary H0 isomorphism. For n=2, the fiber range in edge form 2 is empty. The zero group is finite, finitely generated, torsion, and p-primary; the one-summand cyclic calculations and empty finite decomposition are covered by [F2]–[F3]. Degenerate tensor sums are zero. Both tensor and Tor terms, both axes of the E2 triangle, both edge kernels and cokernels, all four properties, and the failed ideal endpoints are explicit. AC is used in [F3] and [F5], while all closure and finite-filtration deductions add none. No converse and no out-of-range conclusion is asserted.

A1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2

Source notes

Miller, Lecture 30, Examples 30.2–30.5 and the “Serre rings and Serre ideals” paragraph on printed pp. 104–107, gives the four classes and their exact ring/ideal distinction; Propositions 30.7–30.8 on pp. 107–108 give the two edge substitutions.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources