Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The associated graded variety of a two-sided ideal

Definition

Let g be a finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra, with PBW filtration FnU(g) and associated graded algebra gr⁡U(g) (The PBW filtration by tensor degree on the enveloping algebra), and let I⊴U(g) be a two-sided ideal (Left, right and two-sided ideals). For each n≥0 put FnI:=I∩FnU(g) with F−1I=0, and define the associated graded ideal

gr⁡I:=⨁n≥0FnI/Fn−1I⊆gr⁡U(g).

Fix an ordered basis x1,…,xn of g. By PBW gives an ordered monomial basis for the enveloping algebra, its ordered monomials form a basis of U(g) and multiplication identifies gr⁡U(g) with the symmetric algebra S(g), which under this basis is the polynomial algebra C[x1,…,xn] on the symbols; by The associated graded algebra of the PBW filtration is commutative this algebra is commutative, so gr⁡I is an ideal of it. The dual basis of x1,…,xn identifies g∗ with Cn, so elements of S(g) are polynomial functions on g∗. The associated variety of I is the classical affine algebraic set (Classical affine algebraic sets, including the empty boundaries)

V(I):={f∈g∗:p(f)=0 for every p∈gr⁡I}.

It is the zero locus of the family gr⁡I in the polynomial ring on g∗; equivalently V(I)=V(gr⁡I) in the notation of the classical zero loci, a Zariski closed subset of g∗ (Classical affine zero loci form the Zariski closed sets).

Remarks

  • gr⁡I is a graded ideal, not merely a graded subspace. If u∈FmU(g) and v∈FnI, then uv∈I∩Fm+nU(g), and the symbol of uv is the product of the symbols of u and v; hence gr⁡I is closed under multiplication by the whole of gr⁡U(g).
  • The definition does not depend on the ordered basis. The subspaces FnU(g) are defined by tensor degree with no reference to a basis, so gr⁡I is intrinsic; changing the ordered basis changes the identification of S(g) with a polynomial ring by an invertible linear change of variables, whose induced map on Cn is a linear isomorphism carrying one zero locus onto the other. The associated variety V(I) as a subset of g∗ is therefore well defined (The classical vanishing ideal, The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set).
  • Proper ideals and the empty case. If I=U(g) then FnI=FnU(g) for all n, so gr⁡I=gr⁡U(g) and V(I)=∅; if I=0 then gr⁡I=0 and V(I)=g∗. Both boundary cases are allowed by the definition. Primitive ideals are proper, but may be zero; for example, when g=0, the simple U(0)=C-module C has annihilator I=0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources