Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The associated variety is a closed conical coadjoint-invariant cone

Statement

Let g be a finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra and let I⊆U(g) be a two-sided ideal. Then V(I)⊆g∗ is a closed cone: for ξ∈V(I) and t∈C one has tξ∈V(I). Moreover V(I) is invariant under the coadjoint action: for every x∈g and ξ∈V(I) the curve t↦ξ∘e−tad⁡x (using the matrix exponential on g, whose dual maps form a one-parameter group of linear automorphisms of g∗) stays inside V(I). In particular the same conclusions hold for every primitive ideal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra g, a two-sided ideal I⊴U(g), the associated graded ideal gr⁡I⊆S(g)=C[g∗], and the associated variety V(I)={ξ∈g∗:f(ξ)=0 for all f∈gr⁡I}.

[F1]

V(I) is the zero locus of the family gr⁡I in the polynomial algebra on g∗, hence a Zariski closed classical affine algebraic set; gr⁡I is a graded ideal of S(g) (The associated graded variety of a two-sided ideal, Classical affine zero loci form the Zariski closed sets, Classical affine algebraic sets, including the empty boundaries).

[F2]

For every x∈g, the derivation Dx of S(g) extending y↦[x,y] satisfies Dx(gr⁡I)⊆gr⁡I; hence Dxk(gr⁡I)⊆gr⁡I for all k≥0 (The adjoint action preserves the associated graded of a two-sided ideal).

[F3]

Fix a basis of g and use its maximum-coordinate norm and the induced submultiplicative operator norm on End⁡(g). The exponential series for −tad⁡x is dominated on every compact t-disc by the scalar series ∑k≥0(∣t∣∥ad⁡x∥)k/k!, which converges for every t (The exponential series converges absolutely for every real argument); it therefore converges locally uniformly, may be differentiated termwise, and has entire matrix entries (A complex power-series sum has complex derivatives of every order, obtained by repeated termwise differentiation, The sum of a complex power series is analytic throughout its open disc of convergence, Every complex analytic function is holomorphic). Composing those entries with the polynomial f and evaluating at ξ shows φ(t)=f(ξ∘e−tad⁡x) is entire (Complex analytic functions are closed under finite linear combinations, products, quotients with nonzero denominator, and composition). Put E(t)=e−tad⁡x and ξt=ξ∘E(t). Termwise differentiation gives E′(t)=−E(t)ad⁡x. On a linear polynomial y∈g, this yields ddty(ξt)=−(Dxy)(ξt); the product and sum rules extend the identity to every polynomial. Iteration gives φ(k)(0)=(−1)k(Dxkf)(ξ) (Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives). Absolute convergence permits multiplying the exponential series entrywise; collecting total degree and using the binomial formula gives E(s)E(t)=E(s+t), so E(0)=1 and E(−t)=E(t)−1. Thus the dual maps ξ↦ξt form the asserted one-parameter group. Finally, an entire function is equal on C to its Taylor series at 0, so if all these derivatives vanish then φ≡0 (A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

That V(I) is closed is [F1]. For the cone property, write an arbitrary f∈gr⁡I as a finite sum f=∑dfd of its homogeneous components fd∈gr⁡I of degree d, which lie in gr⁡I because it is graded. For t∈C and ξ∈V(I) one has fd(tξ)=tdfd(ξ)=0: by homogeneity for d>0, while for d=0 the degree-zero part of gr⁡I is 0 whenever I is proper, since (I∩F0U(g))/0=I∩C⋅1=0; if I=U(g) then gr⁡I=gr⁡U(g) contains 1 and V(I)=∅, so the assertion is vacuous. Hence f(tξ)=0 for every f, that is tξ∈V(I).

1.2F2F3algebra

Let x∈g, ξ∈V(I) and f∈gr⁡I homogeneous, and put φ(t)=f(ξ∘e−tad⁡x). By [F2] each Dxkf lies in gr⁡I, so [F3] gives φ(k)(0)=(−1)k(Dxkf)(ξ)=0 for every k≥0. By [F3] again φ is entire, so φ≡0; as f was an arbitrary homogeneous element of gr⁡I, the whole curve t↦ξ∘e−tad⁡x lies in V(I).

2.1givenstep 1.1step 1.2∎

Every primitive ideal of U(g) is a two-sided ideal, so steps 1.1 and 1.2 apply to it; no primitivity-specific hypothesis is used in the argument, and the same conclusions therefore hold for every primitive ideal.

Remarks

  • Only the ideal property and the derivation invariance enter. Closedness comes from the definition of the associated variety as a zero locus, conicality from gradedness of gr⁡I, and coadjoint invariance from the derivation invariance Dx(gr⁡I)⊆gr⁡I. Nothing about primitivity, semisimplicity, or nilpotent orbits is used; the deep Borho-Brylinski/Joseph statement that this cone is a single nilpotent orbit closure is not asserted here.
  • The exponential curve. The statement is about the orbit of ξ under the one-parameter group t↦e−tad⁡x in the linear automorphism group of g, transported to g∗ by duality; the analytic input is the convergence of the finite-dimensional exponential series, recorded in [F3].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources