How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Associated sheaf of a graded module on Proj
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the affine scheme construction (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a commutative nonnegatively graded ring with a scheme whose charts are affine opens for every homogeneous of positive degree (Proj carries a scheme structure), and let be a -graded -module. For a homogeneous of positive degree put the degree-zero part of the homogeneous localisation of at : the set of fractions with homogeneous of degree . This is a module over the ring by the same formula as the ring case, and it is the module denoted in Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists.
Construction. On the affine chart let be the associated sheaf of the -module (Module sheaf on an affine scheme), which exists as a quasi-coherent sheaf by The associated module sheaf exists. The associated sheaf of on is the unique sheaf of -modules whose restriction to is under the identification , for every homogeneous of positive degree.
Well-definedness. The data glue. Since the standard opens form a basis of the topology of (Standard opens of Proj), it suffices to specify the sheaf on this basis and to give compatible restriction isomorphisms. For homogeneous of positive degrees , , the element is well defined, and is the distinguished open of (Prime correspondence on a Proj chart). Localising the fraction description of at performs exactly the further localisation inverting : the middle equality because a fraction of fractions divided by a power of is a fraction with denominator a power of , and conversely every class in of degree zero can be written with denominator a power of and numerator of matching degree. The two composite identifications of obtained from and from agree, because both are the canonical localisation maps into the localisation at the product ; the same computation on triple overlaps shows the cocycle condition, and gluing the affine localisations of a module along a basis with compatible restrictions is the standard module-sheaf gluing. Consequently is well defined, the identifications are isomorphisms of -modules, and no choice of charts or trivialisations enters: the only appeal to AC is the inherited one through the associated-module-sheaf construction of The associated module sheaf exists. Functoriality. A homomorphism of graded -modules of degree zero, with for all (Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists), induces -linear maps and hence morphisms of associated sheaves on each chart, compatible with the identifications above; they glue to a morphism of -modules. The construction is additive and respects composition and identities, so is a functor from graded -modules with degree-zero maps to -modules.
Remarks
- Twists. Applying the construction to the shifted module of Graded shift convention for Proj defines the sheaves studied at Twisting sheaf on Proj; the sign convention is the one fixed there.
- No invertibility claim. For an arbitrary nonnegatively graded ring the sheaf need not be invertible; invertibility is proved in Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings under the hypothesis that is generated in degree one over .
- Torsion is not seen. The construction only uses the localisations ; elements of annihilated by a power of the irrelevant ideal localise to zero on every chart and therefore give the zero sheaf. The precise statement is in Empty Proj and irrelevant torsion.
Depends on
Used by
- Twisting sheaf on Proj Definition
- Finite twisted locally free resolutions on projective space Lemma
- Hypersurface cohomology sequence Lemma
- Laurent-monomial decomposition of the projective Cech complex Lemma
- Regular hyperplane step for coherent support induction Lemma
- Residue pairing between H⁰ and top cohomology of projective space Lemma
- Sections of a graded-module sheaf on a standard open Lemma
- Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals Theorem
- Cohomology of O(d) on projective space Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Constructions of Schemes, Section 27.9 (Tag 01MJ) and Section 27.10 (Tag 01MM) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, August 2022 draft, Section 4.5 (standard reference, not scraped)