Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Residue pairing between H^0 and top cohomology of projective space

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field and n≥1, and use the notation and the cohomology computation of Cohomology of O(d) on projective space for Pkn with its twisting sheaves O(d). Then for every d≥0 the cup product of Cup product in sheaf cohomology for the multiplication pairing O(d)⊗ZO(−n−1−d)→O(−n−1) composed with the coefficient isomorphism Hn(Pkn,O(−n−1))→ ∼ k,x0−1⋯xn−1⟼1, is a perfect k-bilinear pairing H0(Pkn,O(d))×Hn(Pkn,O(−n−1−d))⟶k, and it is compatible with multiplication by homogeneous polynomials: if g is a homogeneous polynomial of degree δ≥0 and the two cup products are taken with the multiplication pairings O(d)⊗O(δ)→O(d+δ) and O(−n−1−d−δ)⊗O(δ)→O(−n−1−d), then for all f∈H0(O(d)) and η∈Hn(O(−n−1−d−δ)) one has ⟨g⋅f,η⟩=⟨f,g⋅η⟩. For n=0 the corresponding pairing k×k→k is ordinary multiplication under the identifications O(d)≅O of Pk0=Spec⁡k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the field k, the integer n≥1, the projective space Pkn with twisting sheaves O(d), the cup product of [F1], and the coefficient isomorphism of the statement.

[F1]

For abelian sheaves F,G,H and a tensor pairing μ:F⊗ZG→H, the derived-morphism construction gives a cup product Hp(X,F)×Hq(X,G)→Hp+q(X,H). It is bilinear and natural in the sheaves and pairing, and the class 1X∈H0(X,ZX) acts by the unit isomorphism. (Cup product in sheaf cohomology, Cup-product laws)

[F2]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice.

[F3]

For n≥1, H0(O(m)) has the homogeneous monomial basis for m≥0 and is zero for m<0; Hn(O(m)) has the all-negative Laurent monomial basis of total degree m. For n=0 every twist has H0=k and higher cohomology zero. (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space)

[F4]

The Čech-to-sheaf-cohomology comparison is natural in the coefficient sheaf: it commutes with the cohomology maps induced by a morphism of sheaves, including multiplication by a global section. (Canonical map from fixed-cover Čech to sheaf cohomology)

[F5]

On Proj⁡S, associated graded-module sheaves are obtained from homogeneous localizations on the standard affine charts, functorially in graded-module maps. The standard-cover Čech complex for O(m) has its canonical Laurent-monomial decomposition. Quasi-coherent sheaves on affine schemes are acyclic, and an acyclic ordered cover gives an isomorphism via the canonical Čech comparison. (Associated sheaf of a graded module on Proj, Laurent-monomial decomposition of the projective Cech complex, Affine acyclicity of quasi-coherent sheaves, Leray acyclic-cover comparison)

Proof

1.1F3F5

Fix S=k[x0,…,xn] and Ui=D+(xi). For a nonempty subset I, the intersection UI=D+(∏i∈Ixi) is affine and its twist sections are (S[(∏i∈Ixi)−1])m by [F5]. These are the Laurent monomials whose negative exponents occur only in I. The twists are quasi-coherent on these affines, so [F5] makes this an acyclic cover and identifies its Čech cohomology with sheaf cohomology. In top degree the quotient by Čech boundaries kills exactly the monomials having some nonnegative exponent: such a monomial already occurs on the intersection omitting that index. The remaining all-negative classes are the canonical basis from [F5], giving the basis in [F3]. For a homogeneous polynomial s of degree d, the graded map S(m)→S(m+d) is multiplication by s; localizing shows that its map on every Čech term is ordinary Laurent multiplication.

1.2F3

Basis monomials. By [F3], for n≥1 and d≥0 the space H0(Pkn,O(d)) has as a k-basis the monomials xa‾=x0a0⋯xnan with ai≥0 and ∑iai=d, while Hn(Pkn,O(−n−1−d)) has as a k-basis the Laurent monomials xe‾=x0e0⋯xnen with every ei<0 and ∑iei=−n−1−d.

1.3F3

The coefficient isomorphism. At total degree −n−1 the conditions ei<0 force ei=−1 for every i, so [F3] identifies Hn(Pkn,O(−n−1)) with k by sending x0−1⋯xn−1 to 1.

1.4F1F3

The case n=0. By [F3], Pk0=Spec⁡k, O(d)≅O for every d, H0(O(d))≅k, and all higher cohomology vanishes. The cup product in degree zero is the ordinary section product by [F1], so the pairing is multiplication k×k→k, perfect with dual basis 1, and its compatibility identity is associativity of multiplication.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 1.3

Cup product with a section. Let s∈H0(O(d)) and let m∈Z. The section s determines a sheaf morphism σs:ZPn→O(d) and hence a multiplication morphism μs:O(m)→O(m+d), obtained by composing σs⊗id⁡ with the tensor multiplication pairing. Apply naturality in [F1] to this square of tensor pairings and the unit class 1∈H0(ZPn): for every η∈Hn(O(m)), the cup product s∪η equals Hn(μs)(η). Under the natural Čech comparison [F4], the latter map is computed on the standard cover by multiplying each Laurent Čech representative by s on its intersection. In particular, for m=−n−1−d and monomials s=xa‾, η=xe‾, the value of the pairing is the coefficient of (x0⋯xn)−1 in the Laurent product xa‾xe‾.

3.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1

Monomial duality. Mapping a‾=(a0,…,an) to e‾=(−1−a0,…,−1−an) is a bijection from the nonnegative exponent vectors of total degree d to the all-negative exponent vectors of degree −n−1−d, with inverse ei↦−1−ei. For a matched pair the Laurent product is (x0⋯xn)−1, so the pairing value is 1 by step 2.1. For any other basis vector xe‾′, the product xa‾+e‾′ has exponent vector different from (−1,…,−1), so its coefficient at that monomial is 0. Thus the pairing matrix in the two finite monomial bases is the identity and the pairing is perfect.

3.2F1step 1.3step 2.1

Compatibility with multiplication. Let g be homogeneous of degree δ≥0, let f=xa‾, and let η=xe‾ be a basis element of Hn(O(−n−1−d−δ)). By step 2.1 applied first to gf and then to g and f successively, both ⟨g⋅f,η⟩ and ⟨f,g⋅η⟩ are the coefficient of (x0⋯xn)−1 in gxa‾xe‾; associativity and commutativity of polynomial multiplication identify the two products. Bilinearity [F1] extends the identity to arbitrary f, g and η.

4.1F1F2F3F4step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 1.4∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.2–3.2 prove the perfect pairing and multiplication compatibility for n≥1, and step 1.4 covers n=0. The Axiom of Choice [F2] is inherited through the cup product [F1], the projective cohomology computation [F3], and the Čech comparison [F4]; no further choice is made.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources