Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational-point Koszul residue normalization for a smooth projective embedding

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let i:X↪PkN be a smooth closed projective immersion of pure dimension n, put c=N−n, and let x∈X(k). For regular parameters t1,…,tn at x, normalize the local Koszul class in Ext⁡Xn(kx,ωX) by the dual top cochain et1∧⋯∧etn⟼(−1)ndt1∧⋯∧dtn. Under normalized conormal adjunction and Yoneda composition for x↪X↪PkN, it maps to the ambient point class in Ext⁡PNN(kx,ωPN). Evaluation at 1∈H0(kx) followed by the normalized projective Laurent trace sends that class to 1∈k. This normalization is independent of the parameters and ambient coordinates and commutes with field extension.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: i,X,x,k,n,N,c and regular parameters as in the statement.

[F1]

The ideal of X in PN is locally generated by a regular sequence f1,…,fc, and its conormal sheaf is locally free of rank c. The adjunction isomorphism is ωX≅i∗ωPN⊗det⁡(I/I2)∨. (Smooth closed immersion is regular with exact conormal sequence, Adjunction for a smooth closed subvariety)

[F2]

Koszul resolutions compute the sheaf Ext of a regular immersion; the dual top Koszul cochain is its generator, and concatenation of regular sequences corresponds to tensoring their Koszul complexes. The Koszul Hodge identification has top-degree sign sd=(−1)d(d−1)/2. On a local affine coordinate ring, where the finite-free Koszul complex is a projective resolution, its comparison with derived Ext has degree-d sign σd=(−1)d(d+1)/2. The normalized regular-immersion local-to-global Ext collapse applies σd to the determinant purity identification. Generator changes induce the corresponding determinant chain map. (Koszul sheaf Ext of a smooth regular immersion is concentrated in codimension, Local-to-global Ext collapse for a regular immersion, Koszul Complex Concatenation Tensor Isomorphism, Koszul Generator Matrix Chain Map, Ext is hom in the derived category)

[F3]

The normalized projective trace takes the unique Laurent generator x0−1⋯xN−1 of HN(PkN,ωPN) to 1; projective-space coherent Serre duality pairs Ext⁡PNN(kx,ω) with H0(kx)=k by Yoneda evaluation and this trace. (Residue pairing between H^0 and top cohomology of projective space, Serre duality for coherent sheaves on projective space, Yoneda product is composition in the derived category)

[F4]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice and implies the Dependent Choice hypothesis of the derived-Ext comparison in [F2]. (AC implies DC implies countable choice)

Proof

1.1F2construct

A projective linear coordinate change moves x to [1:0:⋯:0]. On D+(x0)=AkN put za=xa/x0 for 1≤a≤N. In the local ring at x the ordered sequence z=(z1,…,zN) is regular, and Ωz=dz1∧⋯∧dzN is the corresponding generator of ωPN on this chart. Give K(z) the differential d(ei1∧⋯∧eip)=∑j=1p(−1)j−1zijei1∧⋯eij^⋯∧eip. Write a for the raw dual top cochain e1∧⋯∧eN↦Ωz. We shall prove that its trace is (−1)N; the normalized ambient point class is therefore represented by (−1)Na. The same convention with n parameters gives the intrinsic class in the statement.

1.2F1F2

Work locally near x and choose the regular equations f1,…,fc of [F1]. Lift the parameters t1,…,tn from OX,x to the regular local ring OPN,x. Since the conormal sequence is exact and x is smooth, the ordered sequence (f1,…,fc,t1,…,tn) is a regular system of parameters of the ambient local ring. The Koszul concatenation map of [F2] identifies K(f)⊗K(t) with K(f,t) and sends the ordered top tensor to the ordered top wedge. The determinant adjunction of [F1] uses this same conormal-first order: df1∧⋯∧dfc∧dt1∧⋯∧dtn corresponds to dt1∧⋯∧dtn.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Use the ordered affine cover Uj=D+(xj) and the homogeneous Koszul resolution on x1,…,xN; on U0 it is K(z) of 1.1. Put the dual Koszul degree first, so that for a cochain of Koszul degree p and Čech degree q the mixed total differential is D=h+(−1)pδ, where h is precomposition with the Koszul differential and δ is the ordered Čech differential. Start with a on U0 and zero on the other Uj. For J={i1<⋯<iq}⊆{1,…,N}, its correction on U0,i1,…,iq is supported on the Koszul wedge complementary to J and has the form aq=Aq ιiq⋯ιi1azi1⋯ziq,A0=1, where ιi inserts ei into the argument of the alternating dual cochain. The Koszul deletion formula gives hιJa=∑j(−1)q−jzijιJ∖ija; comparing this with the face of δaq−1 and the factor (−1)N−q+1 in D gives Aq=(−1)NAq−1. Thus AN=(−1)N2=(−1)N. The last term is (−1)NΩz/(z1⋯zN), corresponding under the Euler trivialization of ωPN=O(−N−1) to (−1)Nx0−1⋯xN−1. By [F3] the raw class has trace (−1)N, and the normalized class (−1)Na has trace 1 under Yoneda evaluation at 1∈H0(kx). For N=0 the empty Koszul complex gives k→idk.

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

The normalized regular-immersion purity map multiplies the determinant-to-sheaf-Ext identification of [F2] by σc. Its inverse Hodge map contributes sc=(−1)c(c−1)/2, so the determinant frame corresponds to scσc=(−1)c times the raw top cochain for K(f). This sign comparison is made on the affine local ring with its finite-free Koszul resolution, then carried to sheaf Ext by the local comparison in [F2]; it does not require global projectives among sheaves. The intrinsic point class of the statement contributes (−1)n times its raw top cochain. Ordinary Yoneda composition of raw ordered Koszul classes concatenates with coefficient +1: the graded tensor–Hom interchange contributes (−1)cn, while the resolution-to-derived comparison contributes the same factor because σc+n=σcσn(−1)cn. The factors cancel. Hence the composite is represented on K(f,t) by (−1)c+n times its raw top cochain, exactly the ambient normalization of 1.1–2.1. The cases c=0 and n=0 use empty Koszul factors and satisfy the same identities.

4.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Compare (f,t) to z. Their images in the cotangent space at x are two bases, so their Jacobian matrix J has determinant in k×. The Koszul generator matrix changes the ordered top Koszul basis by det⁡J and the dual top cochain by (det⁡J)−1, whereas the ambient differential form changes by det⁡J. The two factors cancel in the Ext class, and the normalization factor (−1)N is unchanged. The same calculation applies to changes of f, of the parameters t, and of projective coordinates, so the class constructed from (f,t) equals the normalized class of 1.1 and has trace 1 by 2.1. All matrix, wedge, Koszul and Laurent formulas commute with a field extension k→k′, and the coefficient 1 remains 1. AC is inherited through the Ext and cohomology suppliers and supplies DC for the derived-Ext comparison in [F2], exactly as recorded in [F4].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

99 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources