How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Block bimodule for the double group
Definition
Fix a splitting -modular system for a finite group , with residue field of characteristic , as in A splitting p-modular system for a finite group is a p-modular system whose fraction and residue fields split the needed group algebras. Let be a primitive central idempotent—specifically, a residue-field block idempotent in the branch of p-blocks from primitive central idempotents. The block bimodule is , viewed as a left -module by . This is an action because and . Centrality of makes stable and the projection splits as bimodules. We write for a subgroup .
This bimodule is nonzero and indecomposable. Indeed a bimodule endomorphism is determined by : for , , so , and conversely central multiplication is a bimodule endomorphism. A direct-sum decomposition would give an idempotent endomorphism other than , hence a central idempotent other than . Then is a nontrivial orthogonal central decomposition, contradicting primitivity. More precisely the endomorphism algebra is local: for a central , stabilized kernels and images of multiplication by split into bimodules, so indecomposability makes either invertible or nilpotent. The nonunits form an ideal, since in this commutative finite algebra sums of nilpotents are nilpotent by the binomial expansion and multiples of nilpotents are nilpotent. This ideal contains every proper ideal and is the unique maximal ideal.
Sources
Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, §§5.2, 11.3, 11.6, 12.3–12.5; especially Lemma 12.4.4 and Theorem 12.4.5, pp.240–241. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.
Depends on
Used by
- A block induced from a subgroup Definition
- A projective simple in a symmetric block forces a matrix block Lemma
- Block centre locality and trace ideal sums Lemma
- Centralizer containment makes block induction well-defined Lemma
- Group algebra bimodule is induced from the diagonal Lemma
- Brauer–Green block compatibility Theorem
- Corresponding block bimodules are Green correspondents Theorem
- Modular block central characters correspond to blocks Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.