How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Modular block central characters correspond to blocks
Statement
For the residue field of a splitting -modular system for finite , the unital -algebra homomorphisms are in bijection with the primitive central block idempotents. The homomorphism for is uniquely characterized by and for every other block idempotent .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated splitting system and finite group.
The finite orthogonal block decomposition is p-blocks from primitive central idempotents.
For , the center is local, with its unique maximal ideal consisting of nilpotents, by Block bimodule for the double group.
A splitting p-modular system for a finite group is a p-modular system whose fraction and residue fields split the needed group algebras supplies scalar endomorphism rings for simple -modules.
Proof
Let be a unital -algebra homomorphism. Each block idempotent maps to an idempotent of a field, hence zero or one. Orthogonality prevents two values from being one, and their sum is one by F1, so exactly one value is one, at an idempotent . For any , ; thus factors through the single center .
Fix a block . Among dimensions of proper left ideals of there is a largest, since zero is proper and dimensions are integers less than . A left ideal of that dimension is maximal, and its quotient is a nonzero simple -module. Extending the action through makes it a simple -module. Each acts as a module endomorphism of , hence as a unique scalar by F3. These scalars define a unital -algebra map . It is surjective because scalar multiples of act by those scalars.
The kernel of is a maximal ideal and therefore is F2's unique maximal ideal . Any other unital -algebra map from to has the same kernel. For , step 1.2 gives , so that map must send to . Thus is independent of and is the unique such map. Extending by and using step 1.1 proves the bijection and the stated characterization. The group algebra is nonzero, so its block set is not empty; a sole block gives a sole map. Selecting one finite-dimensional ideal for an existence proof uses no AC.
Depends on
Used by
- A global block of defect D determines a local block of defect D Lemma
- Centralizer containment makes block induction well-defined Lemma
- Distinct local full-defect blocks induce to distinct global blocks Lemma
- Every local full-defect block induces to a global block of defect D Lemma
- Normal p-subgroups fix block idempotents under Brauer projection Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Martínez, Representation Theory of Finite Groups, Theorem 2.11, p. 15 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Craven, The Brauer Correspondence, central-character setup, pp. 4–6 (standard reference, not scraped)