How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Causally sufficient perfect-oracle discovery regime
Definition
Let be a finite set of observed vertices, let be a directed acyclic graph on , and let be the endogenous variables of a finite recursive structural causal model whose observed set is all of and whose latent set is empty. The model is Markovian: its exogenous random elements are mutually independent. Require that the full-joint law of has a topological probability-kernel factorization: for a topological order , its joint law is formed by composing probability kernels that depend only on the parents of . Also require that is faithful to , meaning its conditional independences among vertex subvectors are exactly the d-separations in . Assume AC for these probability interfaces.
A perfect conditional-independence oracle for this regime accepts any pairwise disjoint and returns “independent” exactly when and are conditionally independent given . The causally sufficient perfect-oracle regime consists of the finite observed DAG, its Markovian recursive model and full-joint law, the faithfulness condition, and this exact oracle. No latent vertex is omitted from the graph supplied to the oracle.
Definition references
Recursive structural causal models on finite DAGs
The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
Measure kernel and probability kernel
DAG factorization implies the global Markov property
Faithfulness of a law to a DAG
Conditional independence given a sigma-algebra
Depends on
- Recursive structural causal models on finite DAGs
- Independent random elements
- The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
- Measure kernel and probability kernel
- DAG factorization implies the global Markov property
- Faithfulness of a law to a DAG
- Conditional independence given a sigma-algebra
- Paths, active paths, and d-separation in a finite DAG
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- Population PC causal-discovery algorithm Algorithm
- A complete three-vertex skeleton has several equivalent DAGs Example
- A hidden common cause is observationally indistinguishable from an edge Example
- PC distinguishes a chain from an unshielded collider Example
- High-dimensional consistency of Gaussian PC structure learning Theorem
- The PC algorithm recovers the oracle CPDAG Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kalisch and Bühlmann, Estimating High-Dimensional Directed Acyclic Graphs with the PC-Algorithm, §§2.1–2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Meek, Causal Inference and Causal Explanation with Background Knowledge, §1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)