Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Recursive structural causal models on finite DAGs

Definition

Fix a finite DAG G=(V,E) and a specified topological ordering v1,…,vn (every arrow points from an earlier to a later vertex). Partition V=O⊔H into observed vertices O and latent vertices H. For each v∈V, specify a measurable state space (Sv,Sv), a measurable exogenous space (Ev,Ev), a jointly measurable structural function fv:∏u∈pa⁡(v)Su×Ev→Sv, and an exogenous random element Uv with values in Ev. Here pa⁡(v)={u:(u,v)∈E}; the empty product is a singleton. The model is Markovian when the finite family (Uv)v∈V is mutually independent. No parametric form or distributional truth is asserted. Correlated disturbances may be represented by adding their common causes as latent vertices, after which the exogenous family in the expanded model is required to be mutually independent.

Recursion in the topological order defines the endogenous random elements uniquely by Xv=fv(Xpa⁡(v),Uv). The full-joint law is the law of (Xv)v∈V; the observed law is its marginal law on O. An observed-only DAG factorization is asserted only when H=∅ or when an additional stated latent-variable condition proves it.

For I⊆V and a value a=(av)v∈I∈∏v∈ISv, do(XI=a) means replace only the equations indexed by I by the constants Xv=av, leaving every other structural function and every exogenous law unchanged. Recursion then defines counterfactual values Xwa for every vertex w; the interventional law is their joint law. The response map (a,ω)↦Xwa(ω) is jointly measurable, by induction through the finite topological order and joint measurability of each fv. This permits evaluation at a random treatment value, such as XwMa. When I={A}, write Xwa for the response under do(A=a). If the factual treatment is A, then on {A=a} recursion gives Xw=Xwa for every vertex w.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources