How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite products of probability kernels are probability kernels
Statement
Let and for be measurable spaces, with , and let be probability kernels with the same source. There is a unique probability kernel whose evaluation on every measurable rectangle is For , the target is the empty-product singleton and is its point mass. For , the product sigma-algebra is the recursive finite product sigma-algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite family of probability kernels and the stated product-space conventions.
The product of two probability measures exists, is a probability measure, and has the rectangle formula. For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique
Measurable rectangles generate the finite product sigma-algebra. The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
Finite measures agreeing on a generating pi-system agree everywhere. Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system
A lambda-system containing a generating pi-system contains its generated sigma-algebra. Dynkin's pi-lambda theorem
Proof
Given: The hypotheses in the statement.
If , use the point mass on the empty-product singleton; if , use . For , fix and build the product recursively: start with , and at stage apply [F1] to the probability measure already constructed on the first factors and the probability measure . This constructs a probability measure on the recursively defined first factors, with the product rectangle formula. Finite induction gives and its formula for every .
For a rectangle , step 1.1 gives , a finite product of measurable real functions, hence measurable. Let be the product-measurable sets for which is measurable. The class contains the whole space and all rectangles. If , then is measurable. For pairwise disjoint , countable additivity gives , a pointwise limit of measurable functions. Thus is a lambda-system. Rectangles form a pi-system and generate the product sigma-algebra by [F2], so [F4] gives . Hence is a probability kernel.
Any other probability kernel with the rectangle formula agrees with on the generating rectangle pi-system for each fixed . The measures are finite, so uniqueness [F3] gives equality on the full product sigma-algebra at every . This proves uniqueness, including the empty product case.
Depends on
- Measure kernel and probability kernel
- The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
- For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique
- Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system
- Dynkin's pi-lambda theorem
Used by
- Finite-group hierarchical Bayesian model Definition
- A bivariate drift and minorization bound geometric coupling error Lemma
- A Gibbs refresh is conditionally independent of the old block Lemma
- A Markovian recursive SCM has a topological kernel factorization Lemma
- Adjacent iid vector functionals admit a finite-moment strong approximation Lemma
- Common drift and strongly aperiodic minorization give a uniform geometric bound Lemma
- Conditional quantile couplings for Gaussian anchored sums Lemma
- Each exact Gibbs block update is reversible and invariant Lemma
- Finite products of dominated kernels have the product density Lemma
- Global drift and one-step minorization give weighted contraction and a unique invariant law Lemma
- Heterogeneous bounded atom vector rows admit a logarithmic cubed Gaussian coupling Lemma
- Small-set coupling yields almost-everywhere total-variation convergence Lemma
- Conditional normal shrinkage in a finite hierarchy Theorem
- Current-group and new-group posterior predictions are probability kernels Theorem
- Dirichlet-process posterior update Theorem
- The sequential particle estimator is unbiased for Feynman–Kac path integrals Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Theorem 5.14 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Terence Tao, An Introduction to Measure Theory, Proposition 1.7.11 (standard reference, not scraped)