Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The sequential particle estimator is unbiased for Feynman–Kac path integrals

Statement

Assume AC and the finite-horizon setup of Feynman–Kac path targets and normalizers and Sequential importance resampling for Feynman–Kac path targets. Fix N∈N with N≥1 and 0≤t≤T. Suppose every prefix normalizer satisfies 0<Zk<∞ for 0≤k≤t. For any nonnegative measurable φ:X0:t→[0,∞] with γt(φ)<∞, define γ^tN(φ)=∫φ d(Z^tπ^tN). Then E[γ^tN(φ)]=γt(φ). In particular, with φ=1, the product-of-average-incremental-weights estimator in the algorithm satisfies E[Z^t]=Zt. At each time either multinomial or residual offspring resampling may be used. The theorem asserts no unbiasedness for the normalized empirical measure π^tN by itself.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the finite-horizon target/proposal assumptions, N≥1, finite positive prefix normalizers, and a nonnegative test function with finite target integral.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is used through the path-law, kernel Radon–Nikodym, and conditional-expectation suppliers.

[F1]

Sequential importance resampling for Feynman–Kac path targets: The initial and incremental weights, normalized fallback, resampling-propagation order, and product normalizer estimate are specified there.

[F2]

Conditional expectation given a sigma algebra: A conditional-expectation version is measurable, integrable, and satisfies its defining event-integral identities.

[F3]

Multinomial and residual resampling have unbiased offspring counts: Conditional expected offspring counts equal N times the input normalized weights for either scheme.

[F4]

Feynman–Kac path measures satisfy the forward recursion: γk(φ)=γk−1(Mk(Gkφ)) for nonnegative measurable φ.

[F5]

Feynman–Kac path Radon–Nikodym weight: Under its support hypotheses, the theorem supplies a nonnegative measurable initial version ρ0=dμ0/dν0 and jointly measurable nonnegative transition versions rk(x,⋅)=dMk(x,⋅)/dRk(x,⋅) for almost every preceding proposal state, with the setwise Radon–Nikodym identities. Each derivative has reference integral one on the relevant conull set.

[F6]

Change of variables for expectation: Expectation of a nonnegative random element function is integration against its law.

[F7]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ): Finite sums of integrable random variables have the sum of their expectations.

[F8]

Conditional expectation exists by radon nikodym: AC and an integrable real random variable give an L1 conditional-expectation version for any sub-sigma-algebra.

[F9]

Tower property of conditional expectation: For nested sigma-algebras and an L1 variable, iterated conditional expectations agree almost surely.

[F10]

Conditional expectation as an ae class: Conditional expectations are integrable measurable equivalence classes with the defining event integrals.

[F11]

Measurability of integration against a kernel: Integrating a nonnegative product-measurable function against a probability kernel gives a measurable section integral.

[F12]

Ionescu-Tulcea construction of a Markov chain: The finite sequence of conditional particle and proposal kernels has a joint law with the stated iterated integrals.

[F13]

A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere: A nonnegative function with zero integral vanishes almost everywhere.

[F14]

Integrating against a Radon-Nikodym derivative recovers integration against the measure: A setwise Radon–Nikodym identity also gives the corresponding integration identity for nonnegative simple functions whose level sets have finite total variation.

[F15]

Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions: Every nonnegative measurable function is an increasing pointwise limit of nonnegative simple functions.

[F16]

Monotone convergence for the integral: Integrals commute with increasing limits of nonnegative measurable functions.

[F17]

Measure kernel and probability kernel: For each measurable set, a probability-kernel evaluation is measurable in its source variable.

[F18]

The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates: Coordinate projections from finite product measurable spaces are measurable.

[F19]

Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability: Compositions of measurable maps are measurable.

[F20]

Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined: Finite sums and products of measurable functions are measurable.

[F21]

Finite products of probability kernels are probability kernels: A finite product of probability kernels with a common source is a probability kernel.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement. For the induction step at k≥1, assume the asserted identity holds at time k−1 for every nonnegative test function with finite γk−1-integral.

1.1A1F1F5F6F7F14F15F16given

First, extend each setwise density identity needed here to nonnegative measurable integrands. If P(A)=∫Au dQ for every measurable A, with u≥0, choose simple gn↑g by [F15]. The simple-function identity [F14] gives ∫gn dP=∫gnu dQ for each n, and [F16] on both sides yields ∫g dP=∫gu dQ, allowing infinity. This applies to the initial law pair and, for almost every preceding proposal state, to each transition-kernel pair in [F5]. At time zero, the algorithm gives γ^0N(φ)=N−1∑i=1NG0(X0i)ρ0(X0i)φ(X0i), with zero-weight terms interpreted by the nonnegative-integral convention 0⋅∞=0. Each X0i has law ν0, so [F6], finite-sum linearity [F7], and the just-proved extension give E[γ^0N(φ)]=∫G0ρ0φ dν0=γ0(φ). The finite target integral makes this random variable integrable.

1.2F1F17F18F19F20F21given

The finite procedure defines measurable transition kernels. The initial IID draws from ν0 form a finite product kernel by [F21]. At each later step, the previous normalized weights are measurable functions of the previous paths by [F17, F18, F19, F20]. The multinomial and residual laws are probability kernels on the finite ancestor-index set: normalization uses division on the Borel branch where the sum is positive, each floor map is Borel since {x:⌊x⌋=m}=[m,m+1), and the R=0 or R>0 branches are Borel. Since R takes only the values 0,…,N−1, each residual output-list probability is a finite sum over possible draw vectors of Borel product masses. For a fixed ancestor vector, the proposal law of the next particles is the finite product of the pullbacks of the Rk kernels along measurable coordinate projections; [F17, F18, F19] make each pullback a probability kernel, and [F21] makes their product a probability kernel. The finite mixture over ancestor vectors is again a probability kernel by finite sums and products [F20]. Thus [F12] applies to the particle-system transitions.

2.1A1F1F5F11F12F13step 1.2given

Every time-zero particle path has law Q0. Inductively, suppose each previous particle path avoids every fixed Qk−1-null history set almost surely. If Qk(A)=0, the pullback of Rk to the history space is a probability kernel by step 1.2, and [F11] makes x0:k−1↦Rk(xk−1,Ax0:k−1) measurable. The proposal path recursion [F12] and zero-integral criterion [F13] show it vanishes for Qk−1-almost every history. The kernel-derivative exceptional parent-state set has a null preimage under the last-coordinate marginal of Qk−1, so every stored path avoids that preimage; resampling copies only existing paths, and propagation therefore avoids A. Each initial or kernel derivative has reference integral one by [F5]; it is therefore finite almost everywhere for its reference law. The finite-valued potentials and the finite particle count then make all particle weights finite almost surely.

3.1A1F1F3F5F11F12F18F19F20step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1given

Write Fk−1 for the previous particle histories and weights. Let Hk be the integral of γ^kN(φ) against the algorithm's conditional finite-step transition law. By [F3], the expected number of children from parent j is Nwˉk−1j. The algorithm gives Z^kwˉki=Z^k−1aki/N when the new weight sum is positive; when it is zero, both sides are zero. For each parent outside the exceptional proposal-marginal null set, [F18, F19, F20] make xk↦Gk(xk)φ(x0:k) nonnegative measurable; apply the simple-approximation extension in step 1.1 to it. The setwise identity in [F5] then gives ∫Gkφ rk dRk=∫Gkφ dMk, including infinite values. Integrating each child's incremental weight and summing the expected counts therefore gives Hk=γ^k−1N(gk), where gk(x0:k−1)=∫Gk(xk)φ(x0:k)Mk(xk−1,dxk). If the previous normalizer estimate is zero, both sides vanish by the algorithm's zero-weight convention. Measurability follows from [F11]. This is initially a nonnegative conditional-kernel integral, not yet an L1 conditional expectation.

4.1A1F2F4F8F9F10F12step 3.1

By [F4], the target integral of gk is γk−1(gk)=γk(φ)<∞. The induction hypothesis therefore gives E[Hk]=γk(φ). For every prior event B∈Fk−1, the ordered joint law of the prior histories and the algorithm's conditional finite-step transition law [F12], integrated with the nonnegative integrand 1Bγ^kN(φ), gives E[1Bγ^kN(φ)]=E[1BHk]. This identity is valid before any integrability assumption, by nonnegative iterated integration. Taking B=Ω shows that γ^kN(φ) has finite expectation γk(φ), so it is in L1; Hk is also in L1 by its finite expectation. Thus the event identities and measurability make Hk a version of E[γ^kN(φ)∣Fk−1] by [F2] and [F10]. The tower property [F9] now yields E[γ^kN(φ)]=γk(φ), completing the induction step.

5.1F1step 4.1algebra∎

Apply the established identity at k=t to the constant function φ=1. Then γ^tN(1)=Z^tπ^tN(1)=Z^t, while γt(1)=Zt, proving the stated normalizer unbiasedness.

Remarks

The proof is finite-horizon and uses precisely the specified full resampling-propagation scheme with unbiased expected offspring counts. It does not imply an unbiased normalized empirical target, a particle-count central limit theorem, a finite-N error bound, or a bound uniform in time.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

84 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources