Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conditional normal shrinkage in a finite hierarchy

Statement

Assume the normal specialization of Finite-group hierarchical Bayesian model with parameter space Θ=R and hyperparameter space H=R×(0,∞). Fix μ∈R and τ2>0. Conditional on (μ,τ2), let the group parameters be independent with θj∼N(μ,τ2). Let the observed group summaries be conditionally independent with Yˉj∣θj∼N(θj,sj2), where each known sj2>0. In this normal specialization, the supplied likelihood-density version is the canonical normal density at every parameter and observation value: fj(θ,y)=(2πsj2)−1/2exp⁡ ⁣(−(y−θ)22sj2)(θ,y∈R). Then, conditional on (μ,τ2,Yˉ1=yˉ1,…,Yˉm=yˉm), the θj are independent and θj∼N(θ^j,Vj),θ^j=yˉj/sj2+μ/τ21/sj2+1/τ2,Vj=(1/sj2+1/τ2)−1. If (μ,τ2) is unknown with a proper hyperprior supported on R×(0,∞), let Py be the full posterior kernel from Hierarchical posterior normalization on positive finite evidence and, on each positive finite evidence fiber, define its hyperparameter marginal on Borel C⊆H by Πy(C):=Py(C×Rm). The posterior law of θj is the mixture of these conditional normal laws over Πy; replacing μ,τ2 by point estimates need not give this posterior. No normalized hyperparameter posterior is asserted on a zero or infinite evidence fiber.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The normal hierarchical model, known positive sampling variances sj2, positive conditional prior variance τ2, and the stated observed group summaries.

[F1]

Conditional on the hyperparameters, the model uses the normal prior N(μ,τ2) and group observation kernels with the canonical normal density factors fj(θ,y)=(2πsj2)−1/2exp⁡(−(y−θ)2/(2sj2)) specified pointwise in the Statement; these factors are jointly measurable, and distinct groups factor under the specified product kernels. Finite-group hierarchical Bayesian model

[F2]

The finite product observation kernel has its specified product density. Finite products of dominated kernels have the product density

[F3]

On a positive finite evidence fiber, the posterior of the full latent tuple is the normalized joint likelihood density. Hierarchical posterior normalization on positive finite evidence

[F4]

Tonelli passes nonnegative integrals through the finite product likelihood and the hyperparameter integral. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

[F5]

For a proper normal prior N(μ0,τ02) and n≥1 IID observations from N(μ,σ2) with known positive variance, the evidence is finite positive and the posterior has precision τ0−2+nσ−2 and precision-weighted mean. Known-variance Normal-Normal conjugate update

[F6]

Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal when that pi-system has an increasing finite-measure exhaustion. Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system

[F7]

Integrating a nonnegative product-measurable function against a finite probability kernel gives a measurable function of its source parameter. Measurability of integration against a kernel

[F8]

Sections and coordinate projections in finite product measurable spaces are measurable, and measurable rectangles generate the product sigma-algebra. Every section of a product-measurable function is measurable, The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates

[F9]

Finite products of probability kernels with a common source are probability kernels and satisfy the product rectangle formula. Finite products of probability kernels are probability kernels

[A1]

AC is assumed for the library normal-law and conditional-expectation-class conventions. The Axiom of Choice

[A2]

τ2>0 and all sj2>0.

Proof

technique · specialize the BCS-03 Normal–Normal update to each group, factor the finite conditional posterior, and integrate over the hyperparameter posterior

Given: The stated fixed hyperparameters, group summaries, and variances.

1.1A1A2F1F5givenalgebra

Fix a group j and specialize [F5] to one observation: identify its parameter with θj, set μ0=μ, τ02=τ2, n=1, y1=yˉj, and σ2=sj2. The model and pointwise density specification in [F1] supply this normal prior and the canonical normal likelihood density used by [F5], while [A1] and [A2] verify the choice and positive-variance hypotheses of [F5]. The theorem gives a finite positive group evidence and posterior variance Vj=(1/τ2+1/sj2)−1 and mean θ^j=Vj(μ/τ2+yˉj/sj2), as stated.

2.1A1A2F1F2F3F4F5F6F8F9step 1.1algebra

For each group put μj(A)=∫Afj(θ,yˉj)N(μ,τ2)(dθ) and let mj=μj(R)>0. By [F5] and step 1.1, μj/mj=Qj=N(θ^j,Vj). Apply [F3] to the hierarchy with the proper point-mass hyperprior at the fixed (μ,τ2). Its latent prior on Rm is the product of the group priors by [F1], and its likelihood density is ∏jfj(θj,yˉj) by [F2]. Repeated Tonelli [F4] shows that the normalized posterior assigns each measurable rectangle ∏jAj mass ∏jμj(Aj)/∏jmj=∏jQj(Aj), the rectangle mass of ⨂jQj by [F9]. By [F8], rectangles form a generating pi-system. Both are probability measures agreeing on it; the constant exhaustion by the full space has common finite mass one, so [F6] makes them equal. This proves conditional independence and the displayed formula for every group.

3.1F3F4F5F7F8step 1.1algebra∎

Now suppose (μ,τ2) is random with a proper hyperprior supported on H. For fixed observed summaries, put Mj((μ,τ2),A)=∫Afj(θ,yˉj)N(μ,τ2)(dθ). The factor fj(⋅,yˉj) is measurable by the section fact [F8]; composing it with the parameter-coordinate projection shows that (η,θ)↦1A(θ)fj(θ,yˉj) is product-measurable. Since Gη=N(μ,τ2) is a probability kernel, [F7] makes Mj(⋅,A) measurable. Hence mj=Mj(⋅,R) and Qj(A)=Mj(⋅,A)/mj are measurable, with mj>0 by step 1.1. Repeated Tonelli [F4] and the full-posterior formula [F3] give, for measurable C⊆H and A1,…,Am⊆R, Py(C×∏jAj)=Z(y)−1∫C∏jMj((μ,τ2),Aj) Π(dμ,dτ2). Taking every Aj=R shows Πy(C)=Z(y)−1∫C∏jmj dΠ. Taking only Aj=A and all other sets equal to R therefore gives Py(θj∈A)=∫HQj(A) Πy(dμ,dτ2). By [F5] and step 1.1, Qj=N(θ^j,Vj), so the group posterior is its conditional normal law averaged over the full hyperparameter posterior. If Πy is a point mass, this mixture equals its single conditional normal component; in general it need not equal a plug-in law.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources