How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conditional normal shrinkage in a finite hierarchy
Statement
Assume the normal specialization of Finite-group hierarchical Bayesian model with parameter space and hyperparameter space . Fix and . Conditional on , let the group parameters be independent with . Let the observed group summaries be conditionally independent with , where each known . In this normal specialization, the supplied likelihood-density version is the canonical normal density at every parameter and observation value: Then, conditional on , the are independent and If is unknown with a proper hyperprior supported on , let be the full posterior kernel from Hierarchical posterior normalization on positive finite evidence and, on each positive finite evidence fiber, define its hyperparameter marginal on Borel by . The posterior law of is the mixture of these conditional normal laws over ; replacing by point estimates need not give this posterior. No normalized hyperparameter posterior is asserted on a zero or infinite evidence fiber.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The normal hierarchical model, known positive sampling variances , positive conditional prior variance , and the stated observed group summaries.
Conditional on the hyperparameters, the model uses the normal prior and group observation kernels with the canonical normal density factors specified pointwise in the Statement; these factors are jointly measurable, and distinct groups factor under the specified product kernels. Finite-group hierarchical Bayesian model
The finite product observation kernel has its specified product density. Finite products of dominated kernels have the product density
On a positive finite evidence fiber, the posterior of the full latent tuple is the normalized joint likelihood density. Hierarchical posterior normalization on positive finite evidence
Tonelli passes nonnegative integrals through the finite product likelihood and the hyperparameter integral. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
For a proper normal prior and IID observations from with known positive variance, the evidence is finite positive and the posterior has precision and precision-weighted mean. Known-variance Normal-Normal conjugate update
Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal when that pi-system has an increasing finite-measure exhaustion. Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system
Integrating a nonnegative product-measurable function against a finite probability kernel gives a measurable function of its source parameter. Measurability of integration against a kernel
Sections and coordinate projections in finite product measurable spaces are measurable, and measurable rectangles generate the product sigma-algebra. Every section of a product-measurable function is measurable, The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
Finite products of probability kernels with a common source are probability kernels and satisfy the product rectangle formula. Finite products of probability kernels are probability kernels
AC is assumed for the library normal-law and conditional-expectation-class conventions. The Axiom of Choice
and all .
Proof
Given: The stated fixed hyperparameters, group summaries, and variances.
Fix a group and specialize [F5] to one observation: identify its parameter with , set , , , , and . The model and pointwise density specification in [F1] supply this normal prior and the canonical normal likelihood density used by [F5], while [A1] and [A2] verify the choice and positive-variance hypotheses of [F5]. The theorem gives a finite positive group evidence and posterior variance and mean , as stated.
For each group put and let . By [F5] and step 1.1, . Apply [F3] to the hierarchy with the proper point-mass hyperprior at the fixed . Its latent prior on is the product of the group priors by [F1], and its likelihood density is by [F2]. Repeated Tonelli [F4] shows that the normalized posterior assigns each measurable rectangle mass , the rectangle mass of by [F9]. By [F8], rectangles form a generating pi-system. Both are probability measures agreeing on it; the constant exhaustion by the full space has common finite mass one, so [F6] makes them equal. This proves conditional independence and the displayed formula for every group.
Now suppose is random with a proper hyperprior supported on . For fixed observed summaries, put . The factor is measurable by the section fact [F8]; composing it with the parameter-coordinate projection shows that is product-measurable. Since is a probability kernel, [F7] makes measurable. Hence and are measurable, with by step 1.1. Repeated Tonelli [F4] and the full-posterior formula [F3] give, for measurable and , . Taking every shows . Taking only and all other sets equal to therefore gives . By [F5] and step 1.1, , so the group posterior is its conditional normal law averaged over the full hyperparameter posterior. If is a point mass, this mixture equals its single conditional normal component; in general it need not equal a plug-in law.
Depends on
- Finite-group hierarchical Bayesian model
- Finite products of dominated kernels have the product density
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Hierarchical posterior normalization on positive finite evidence
- Known-variance Normal-Normal conjugate update
- Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system
- Measurability of integration against a kernel
- Every section of a product-measurable function is measurable
- The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
- Finite products of probability kernels are probability kernels
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Gelman, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern, David B. Dunson, Aki Vehtari, and Donald B. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed., §5.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alicia A. Johnson, Miles Q. Ott, and Mine Dogucu, Bayes Rules!, Chapter 16 (standard reference, not scraped)