How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Current-group and new-group posterior prediction
Definition
Let be the data space and its measurable subset of positive finite evidence fibers. Write for the full latent probability kernel supplied by Hierarchical posterior normalization on positive finite evidence, and set for every . On this is the normalized joint posterior; off it is the prior filler , so no likelihood quotient is formed there. For an already observed group , its current-group posterior predictive law for a future observation with the same conditional observation kernel is
For a new group, specify a probability kernel from to a future observation space . Its new-group posterior predictive law is For , if denotes the hyperparameter marginal of , the joint posterior law of used here is . Thus the new-group prediction first draws a new latent parameter from and then draws its observation from . On both formulas average over the joint posterior and retain uncertainty about unknown hyperparameters. On exceptional fibers they reduce to prior-predictive laws because .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Gelman, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern, David B. Dunson, Aki Vehtari, and Donald B. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed., §5.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alicia A. Johnson, Miles Q. Ott, and Mine Dogucu, Bayes Rules!, Chapter 16, §16.5 (standard reference, not scraped)