Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Irreducible affine Coxeter type: the corank-one form, the radical quotient, and the affine slice

Definition

Let S be finite, let m be a Coxeter matrix on S, let W be the presented Coxeter group (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups), let Γ be its Coxeter diagram (Coxeter diagrams: edges, labels, components and finite type), and let V=RS carry the real Coxeter form B (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps): B(es,es)=1, B(es,et)=−cos⁡(π/m(s,t)) for finite labels, and B(es,et)=−1 when m(s,t)=∞. Put rad⁡(B):={v∈V:B(v,w)=0 for every w∈V} (The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space).

(1) Affine form type. The system (W,S), and with it m, Γ and B, is of affine form type when Γ is connected and B is positive semidefinite (meaning B(v,v)≥0 for every v∈V) of corank one, that is, dim⁡Rrad⁡(B)=1 (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature p−q of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis). By Positive radical, corank one, positive definiteness of proper submatrices, and domination exclusions ↗ (1), this is equivalent to requiring that Γ be connected, B positive semidefinite, and B not positive definite. This is the only notion called affine on this page. It is a condition on the Coxeter form, not a synonym for an infinite abstract Coxeter group. Disconnected systems are outside this definition; the companion examples page treats reducible forms separately.

(2) Positive radical vector. A positive radical vector for affine form type is a vector δ=∑s∈Sδses∈rad⁡(B) with δs>0 for every s∈S. For affine form type such a vector exists and rad⁡(B)=Rδ, by Positive radical, corank one, positive definiteness of proper submatrices, and domination exclusions ↗ (1); this clause names the object and records the property supplied by that lemma.

(3) Radical quotient. Let U:=V/rad⁡(B) (The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection), and define b(vˉ,wˉ):=B(v,w). The form b is well-defined, symmetric and positive definite. Thus U is a Euclidean vector space (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length) of dimension ∣S∣−1 (Linear subspace of a vector space, Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis).

(4) Affine slice and walls. For a positive radical vector δ, put Eδ:={φ∈V∗:φ(δ)=1}, where V∗ is the algebraic dual (Linear functionals and the algebraic dual V∗=L(V,F)). This is an affine subspace (Affine subspaces as translates x+U of linear subspaces) with direction space Kδ:={φ∈V∗:φ(δ)=0}=Ann⁡(rad⁡(B)). Precomposition with the quotient projection identifies Kδ with U∗. Let b♭:U→U∗ be b♭(u):=b(u,⋅) (Bilinear forms on V correspond linearly and bijectively to linear maps V→V∗); it is an isomorphism, as verified in the remarks, and the dual form is b∗(α,β):=b((b♭)−1α,(b♭)−1β). Transporting b∗ to the direction space Kδ makes Eδ a Euclidean affine space of dimension ∣S∣−1. For s∈S, its wall is Hs:={φ∈Eδ:φ(es)=0}, its open alcove is A:={φ∈Eδ:φ(es)>0 for every s∈S}, and Aˉ denotes the closure of A in Eδ.

(5) Abstentions and conventions. Beyond the constructions and properties above, this definition does not assert that the Hs are affine hyperplanes, that A is nonempty, bounded or a simplex, that W acts on Eδ as a group generated by affine reflections, or that the translates wAˉ cover Eδ. The phrase affine form type refers only to the Coxeter-matrix condition in (1); extended affine Weyl groups and the directed affine Dynkin diagrams used in Lie theory are separate conventions and are not defined here. No choice principle is used in these finite-dimensional constructions.

Remarks

The quotient-form assertions in (3) follow directly from positive semidefiniteness. If r∈rad⁡(B), then replacing either representative by one differing by a radical vector does not change B(v,w), so b is well-defined; symmetry is inherited from B. If b(vˉ,vˉ)=0, then for every w∈V and every t∈R, 0≤B(v+tw,v+tw)=2tB(v,w)+t2B(w,w). Both signs of arbitrarily small t force B(v,w)=0. This holds for every w, so v∈rad⁡(B) and vˉ=0.

The dimension claim in (3) is also explicit. Since the radical has dimension one, choose a nonzero r=∑srses in it and an index s0 with rs0≠0. The classes eˉs for s≠s0 span U, because eˉs0=−∑s≠s0(rs/rs0)eˉs. They are independent: if ∑s≠s0ases lies in Rr, its s0 coordinate forces that multiple of r to be zero, and then every as=0. They are therefore a basis of size ∣S∣−1.

For (4), Eδ is nonempty: choose s0 with δs0>0 and use the coordinate functional φ0(v):=vs0/δs0. Its direction is Kδ, which equals the annihilator of rad⁡(B) because that radical is the line Rδ. The map U∗→Kδ, λ↦λ∘π, with π:V→U the quotient projection, is injective since π is onto; it is surjective because each functional in Kδ vanishes on the radical and therefore factors through π. A basis of U gives dual coordinate functionals: each functional is determined by its values on that basis, and arbitrary values extend linearly. Thus they form a basis of U∗ and dim⁡U∗=dim⁡U=∣S∣−1. Finally, b♭ is injective: if b♭(u)=0, then b(u,u)=0, hence u=0 by positive definiteness. The images under b♭ of a basis of U are therefore ∣S∣−1 independent vectors in the ∣S∣−1 dimensional space U∗, so they form a basis and b♭ is an isomorphism. The displayed formula therefore defines a positive-definite inner product on U∗ and hence on Kδ. All selections above are single finite-dimensional constructions; no arbitrary choice principle is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources