How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The radical vector of A-tilde 2 and its Euclidean slice
Example
Let , for , so that (The standard affine diagrams A-tilde, B-tilde, C-tilde, D-tilde, E-tilde, F-tilde and G-tilde (1)), and let be the cosine matrix on (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps). Then:
(i) is positive semidefinite of corank one, its kernel is with (Positive radical, corank one, positive definiteness of proper submatrices, and domination exclusions (1)), and all proper principal submatrices of (the rank-two principal minors) are positive definite. The eigenvalue statement behind the corank: for , and ; the determinant is zero and each principal submatrix has determinant (Sylvester's criterion: a real symmetric matrix with is positive definite if and only if all leading principal minors are positive).
(ii) The radical quotient is two-dimensional Euclidean; the affine slice is , i.e. with coordinate sum , and the three vertices of the alcove simplex (The affine slice: faithful isometric action, the alcove simplex, and its facet reflections (3)) are , , (coordinate functionals). The alcove is the standard equilateral triangle: the three side vectors are differences of distinct vertices, each of dual -norm squared , so the side length is (the dual metric is the slice metric, rather than the quotient form applied to the same coordinate tuple).
(iii) The three walls meet pairwise at the angle (their normals are the classes of the , whose pairwise -pairing is ), so each facet-reflection product has order ; the facet reflections generate the faithful affine action of on (The affine slice: faithful isometric action, the alcove simplex, and its facet reflections (4)), in agreement with the constant term -relation .
(iv) Comparison with the crystallographic alcove: is the alcove diagram of the root system by Crystallographic alcove diagrams: the affine list realized by Weyl types A–G (1); both alcoves have facet normals with the same Gram matrix and are therefore similar facet-to-facet by Euclidean simplices with the same facet-normal Gram matrix are similar facet to facet; the two reflection groups are conjugate. The alcove of Highest-root dominance and the fundamental alcove (2) in its ambient Euclidean plane is accordingly related to the slice triangle by a similarity matching facets, and the ratio of the side lengths gives the scale factor.
(v) The radical vector is exactly the positive relation among the facet normals: in (The affine slice: faithful isometric action, the alcove simplex, and its facet reflections (2)-(3)), and the property that its coefficients are all positive is what makes a bounded simplex rather than an unbounded cone.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The three-vertex all- diagram and its displayed form.
The form is the cosine form, whose generator reflections are (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps).
The quotient and dual slice metric use and its inverse, not the same coordinate quadratic form on vectors and functionals (Irreducible affine Coxeter type: the corank-one form, the radical quotient, and the affine slice (3)–(4)).
The slice vertices, simplex normals, faithful action and reflection formulas are The affine slice: faithful isometric action, the alcove simplex, and its facet reflections (1)–(4).
The root system has simple roots , highest root , and the alcove inequalities are , (Classical root systems in coordinates, Highest-root dominance and the fundamental alcove). Its affine facet-normal Gram matrix is the one displayed here (Crystallographic alcove diagrams: the affine list realized by Weyl types A–G (1)–(2)).
Equal facet-normal Gram matrices give a facet-matching similarity conjugating the reflection groups (Euclidean simplices with the same facet-normal Gram matrix are similar facet to facet).
Proof
For , direct expansion gives . It is nonnegative and vanishes exactly on ; matrix multiplication also gives , so this is precisely the radical. Each two-coordinate principal form is , positive definite; the one-coordinate forms are and the empty case is vacuous. Their determinants are , and the full determinant is zero.
The slice relation is , and [F3] gives its coordinate vertices and triangular closure. Put . Every class in has a unique representative in , obtained by subtracting the mean of its coordinates, so is a linear isomorphism. The direction space consists of functionals with coordinate tuple ; under the representative identification, , so represents using the standard dot product on . For , the matrix in [F1] gives ; hence is represented by , and is represented by . Therefore . Each difference has tuple with one , one and one zero, so its squared length is . All three sides therefore have length in the prescribed Euclidean slice metric.
The inward unit normals are ; their pairings are for distinct indices by [F3]. The walls of the triangle thus meet at interior angle , and composing two line reflections gives rotation by , of exact order three. The facet reflections generate the faithful action by [F3]. The relation among the normals is , with all coefficients one. Its positivity gives the bounded coordinate simplex directly: and bound each coordinate.
In the coordinate plane , the closed root alcove is and . Its vertices are the intersections of pairs of its three wall equations. The equations and , together with the coordinate sum, give . For and , write , ; then , giving . For and , write , ; then , giving . Each point satisfies the remaining inequality. Each difference of two distinct vertices is, up to coordinate permutation and sign, , so its squared length is . By [F4,F5] the root alcove and slice triangle are similar facet to facet, and the similarity from root alcove to slice has scale , since . It conjugates the corresponding reflection groups. This proves all the stated radical, wall, metric and comparison data without Choice.
Depends on
- Irreducible affine Coxeter type: the corank-one form, the radical quotient, and the affine slice
- Positive radical, corank one, positive definiteness of proper submatrices, and domination exclusions
- The standard affine diagrams A-tilde, B-tilde, C-tilde, D-tilde, E-tilde, F-tilde and G-tilde
- The affine slice: faithful isometric action, the alcove simplex, and its facet reflections
- The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps
- Classical root systems in coordinates
- Sylvester's criterion: a real symmetric $n\times n$ matrix with $n\geq1$ is positive definite if and only if all leading principal minors are positive
- Crystallographic alcove diagrams: the affine list realized by Weyl types A–G
- Euclidean simplices with the same facet-normal Gram matrix are similar facet to facet
- Highest-root dominance and the fundamental alcove
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
95 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. W. Davis, The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter Groups (first-edition author manuscript, Princeton University Press, 2008; 600 PDF pages) (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. Xiong, Lectures on Affine Weyl Groups (complete lecture notes, October 2024; 77 PDF pages) (standard reference, not scraped)