Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

c-sortable elements, forced and unforced skips, skip roots, and the chamber cone

Definition

Let (W,S) be a Coxeter system of finite type with S finite, with root system Φ=Φ+⊔Φ− and the identification V≅V∗ by B of The finite reflection arrangement, its chambers, the spherical chamber complex, and the coset face poset, and let c=s1⋯sn be a reduced Coxeter word with periodic word c∞ as in Coxeter elements, the oriented Euler form, the skew form, and the periodic word; the block sequence of the c∞-sorting word is well defined by The greedy scan computes the c-sorting word; commutation, conjugation and rank-two alignment (2).

(1) c-sortable elements. An element v∈W is c-sortable when the block sequence (T1,T2,… ) of its c∞-sorting word is weakly decreasing under inclusion: T1⊇T2⊇⋯ (with the sequence read up to its last nonempty set). By The greedy scan computes the c-sorting word; commutation, conjugation and rank-two alignment (2) this condition is independent of the chosen reduced Coxeter word for c.

(2) Skips and forcedness. For any v∈W, fix a c-sorting word a1⋯ak of v (so a1,…,ak are the letters of the sorting word in order and k=ℓ(v)), and let r∈S. The leftmost unselected occurrence of r is the least position of c∞ carrying r which is not among the selected positions; it exists because the sorting word is finite and infinitely many occurrences of r follow it. If i is the number of selected letters preceding that position, the sorting word is said to skip r in the (i+1)-st position, with associated reflection t:=a1⋯air ai⋯a1. The skip is forced when the word a1⋯air is not reduced, and unforced otherwise; write t∈fsc(v) in the forced case and t∈ufsc(v) in the unforced case, and set Ac(v):={−βt:t∈fsc(v)} and Bc(v):={βt:t∈ufsc(v)}. By the definition of the sorting word, the leftmost unselected occurrence of r is determined by v and the chosen reduced Coxeter word for c; the reflection t is determined by the selected prefix preceding it. Word independence for sortable v is established by the justifier in (3).

(3) Skip roots. For r∈S the skip root is Ccr(v):=ρ(a1⋯ai) er=±βt, with the sign rule Ccr(v)=−βt  ⟺  r is a forced skip of v,Ccr(v)=+βt  ⟺  r is an unforced skip of v, where βt is the positive root of t and t is the reflection attached to the leftmost unselected occurrence of r as in (2). The sign rule holds for every v: the root-length criterion of The root-length criterion and faithfulness of the canonical reflection representation (1) identifies the sign of ρ(a1⋯ai)er with whether the reduced prefix followed by r is reduced.

When v is c-sortable, the raw skip roots equivalently satisfy the following recursion of Reading--Speyer section 5: with s initial in c, Ccr(v)=es if v̸≥Rs and r=s; Ccr(v)=Cscr(v) if v̸≥Rs and r≠s; and Ccr(v)=ρ(s) Cscsr(sv) if v≥Rs. For c-sortable v, agreement of the raw formula with this recursion, termination by induction on the pair (rank, length), and independence of the chosen reduced Coxeter word for c are proved in Skip roots form a basis, negative skips are cover roots, and the cover decomposition of sortable elements ↗ (1),(2). The recursive description and these justifier assertions apply only in that sortable case; the raw formula and sign rule above remain defined and valid for every v∈W.

(4) The cone. For c-sortable v put Conec(v):={x∈V:B(x,Ccr(v))≥0 for every r∈S}, the intersection of the closed half-spaces with inward normals the skip roots, under the identification V≅V∗ by B. Nothing beyond this definition is asserted here; that Conec(v) is a full-dimensional simplicial cone, that its walls are the root hyperplanes of all its skip roots, and that it is a union of chambers is proved in the later items of this page.

(5) Abstentions. Nothing about the projection πc, greatest sortable elements, chamber unions, monotonicity, the traditional Cambrian congruence or noncrossing partitions is asserted here, and no finiteness of W beyond the finite-type hypothesis of this page is used. No Choice is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources