How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
c-sortable elements, forced and unforced skips, skip roots, and the chamber cone
Definition
Let be a Coxeter system of finite type with finite, with root system and the identification by of The finite reflection arrangement, its chambers, the spherical chamber complex, and the coset face poset, and let be a reduced Coxeter word with periodic word as in Coxeter elements, the oriented Euler form, the skew form, and the periodic word; the block sequence of the -sorting word is well defined by The greedy scan computes the c-sorting word; commutation, conjugation and rank-two alignment (2).
(1) c-sortable elements. An element is -sortable when the block sequence of its -sorting word is weakly decreasing under inclusion: (with the sequence read up to its last nonempty set). By The greedy scan computes the c-sorting word; commutation, conjugation and rank-two alignment (2) this condition is independent of the chosen reduced Coxeter word for .
(2) Skips and forcedness. For any , fix a -sorting word of (so are the letters of the sorting word in order and ), and let . The leftmost unselected occurrence of is the least position of carrying which is not among the selected positions; it exists because the sorting word is finite and infinitely many occurrences of follow it. If is the number of selected letters preceding that position, the sorting word is said to skip in the -st position, with associated reflection . The skip is forced when the word is not reduced, and unforced otherwise; write in the forced case and in the unforced case, and set and . By the definition of the sorting word, the leftmost unselected occurrence of is determined by and the chosen reduced Coxeter word for ; the reflection is determined by the selected prefix preceding it. Word independence for sortable is established by the justifier in (3).
(3) Skip roots. For the skip root is with the sign rule where is the positive root of and is the reflection attached to the leftmost unselected occurrence of as in (2). The sign rule holds for every : the root-length criterion of The root-length criterion and faithfulness of the canonical reflection representation (1) identifies the sign of with whether the reduced prefix followed by is reduced.
When is -sortable, the raw skip roots equivalently satisfy the following recursion of Reading--Speyer section 5: with initial in , if and ; if and ; and if . For -sortable , agreement of the raw formula with this recursion, termination by induction on the pair (rank, length), and independence of the chosen reduced Coxeter word for are proved in Skip roots form a basis, negative skips are cover roots, and the cover decomposition of sortable elements ↗ (1),(2). The recursive description and these justifier assertions apply only in that sortable case; the raw formula and sign rule above remain defined and valid for every .
(4) The cone. For -sortable put the intersection of the closed half-spaces with inward normals the skip roots, under the identification by . Nothing beyond this definition is asserted here; that is a full-dimensional simplicial cone, that its walls are the root hyperplanes of all its skip roots, and that it is a union of chambers is proved in the later items of this page.
(5) Abstentions. Nothing about the projection , greatest sortable elements, chamber unions, monotonicity, the traditional Cambrian congruence or noncrossing partitions is asserted here, and no finiteness of beyond the finite-type hypothesis of this page is used. No Choice is used.
Depends on
- Coxeter elements, the oriented Euler form, the skew form, and the periodic word
- The greedy scan computes the c-sorting word; commutation, conjugation and rank-two alignment
- The weak parabolic projection, its adjoints, and the cover-join lemmas
- The geometric inversion set $N(w)$ of an element of a Coxeter group
- The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps
- The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone
- The finite reflection arrangement, its chambers, the spherical chamber complex, and the coset face poset
- The root-length criterion and faithfulness of the canonical reflection representation
Used by
- The recursive initial-letter sortable projection Definition
- The sortable projection kernel and the c-Cambrian quotient Definition
- All skips and the cone walls of the sortable element s1s2 in A3 Example
- The c-Cambrian quotient of S3 for both orientations: fibers, endpoints and meet/join preservation Example
- The c-sortable subset of A3 for c = s1s2s3, a three-element fiber, and the upper endpoint map Example
- Omega-positive words are commutation-equivalent to sortable sorting words; sortable equals aligned; parabolic restriction Lemma
- Skip roots form a basis, negative skips are cover roots, and the cover decomposition of sortable elements Lemma
- The cone criterion, monotonicity of the projection, and the greatest sortable element below w Lemma
- The recursive projection is well defined, sortable-valued, below w, idempotent, descent-detecting and parabolic Lemma
- Skip bases, cover roots, greatest-sortable projections, and the chamber union of each cone Theorem
- Sortable elements form a sublattice and the c-Cambrian quotient is its lattice-homomorphic image Theorem
- The upper endpoint of a c-Cambrian fiber, interval fibers and the explicit formula u_c(w) = pi_c⁻¹(ww0)w0 Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- N. Reading and D. E. Speyer, Sortable elements in infinite Coxeter groups, arXiv:0803.2722v3 (2010); Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 363 (2011) 699-761 (standard reference, not scraped)
- N. Reading, Sortable elements and Cambrian lattices, arXiv:math/0512339v1 (2005); Algebra Universalis 56 (2007) 35-56 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Bjorner and F. Brenti, Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 231, Springer 2005 (standard reference, not scraped)