How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The coloured reduced Burau matrix
Definition
Let and let be the standard generators of (The braid group by Artin presentation). Let be a braid word. Labelling of the strings. Put the label on the string of which starts at the point at the bottom of the braid diagram, so that the labels are read from the bottom left. Reading the letters of the word from left to right as the crossings from the top of the diagram, let be the label of the undercrossing string at crossing , where for the positive generator the undercrossing string is the one entering the crossing at position and for the negative generator the one entering at position ; this is the convention of Morton §2.1, checked against his example , where .
The matrices. For and a label let be the matrix over the Laurent ring which agrees with the identity matrix (Invertible square matrices and similarity over a commutative ring) except that its -th row has the three entries where an entry is omitted when its column index lies outside : for the entry in column is omitted and for the entry in column is omitted, so that for each boundary row has exactly two non-zero entries, while for the sole row is the single entry . Each is upper triangular except for the single entry in position , so is a unit of and the matrix is invertible (For , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and for a real matrix); its inverse is the matrix whose -th row has entries , and , again truncated at the boundary columns. This is Morton's matrix (§2.1); the three places are the entries on row produced by the Fox derivatives of the elementary braid, and the truncation rule is his.
The coloured reduced Burau matrix. The coloured reduced Burau matrix of the braid word is the product taken in the order of the word, an element of . It is a direct matrix product, so no well-definedness issue beyond matrix multiplication arises; the chosen word enters only through the labels .
Equal labels and conventions. Specialising gives Morton's equal-label matrix over . For comparison with the topological representation, assume AC, as in The reduced Burau representation and The Axiom of Choice. Put . The fixed adjacent weighted basis of that representation is with . Its generator matrix has row entries , truncated at the boundary, by The topological and matrix Burau representations agree. Diagonal conjugation of the displayed row gives these entries, so Consequently . These identities concern equal labels; the labelled matrix remains defined algebraically for the chosen word without a Choice assumption.
Remarks
- The determinant of each is , so for a word of length , a monomial in the labels; in particular the coloured matrix is invertible over .
- Morton's matrices act on column vectors with the product ordered as the word, exactly as displayed; no inverse order is taken. At equal labels the generator matrix has the same characteristic polynomial as the reduced Burau generator. The determinant comparison for arbitrary braid words follows from simultaneous conjugacy by the fixed matrix , rather than from the characteristic polynomials of individual generators alone.
Depends on
- The reduced Burau representation
- The unreduced Burau matrices
- Invertible square matrices and similarity over a commutative ring
- For $n\ge1$, the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and $|\det A|$ for a real matrix
- The braid group by Artin presentation
- The group ring $R[G]$ of finitely supported formal $R$-linear combinations of group elements
- The topological and matrix Burau representations agree
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- H. R. Morton, The multivariable Alexander polynomial for a closed braid, arXiv:math/9803138, section 2.1 printed pp. 2-3 (the labelled strings, the matrices C_i(a) and the labelled product B_beta) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joan S. Birman and Tara E. Brendle, Braids: A Survey, section 4.2 printed pp. 45-47 (the unreduced and reduced Burau representations) (standard reference, not scraped)