How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conic, LP, and convex QP primal-dual models
Definition
For a finite-dimensional real inner-product space , a cone is a set closed under addition and multiplication by nonnegative scalars. A cone is proper when it is closed, convex, pointed (), and has nonempty interior. Its dual cone is
Let and be linear, let , , and . A matrix has full row rank when its rows are linearly independent. The conic primal problem and its displayed dual pair are where is the adjoint, defined by . For any feasible pair, its gap is The special case has dual and gap .
For , the latter is the standard-form LP subject to , , with dual variables free and . A convex QP in this convention has objective , with symmetric , the same equality, and . Its Lagrangian is ; a feasible KKT tuple obeys , and its dual function is . The dual value is .
For a Lorentz cone , let , , , and . Then is membership of in . With no equality constraints, the SOCP under these constraints has dual For symmetric matrices, means for every and the pairing is . Thus subject to , has dual subject to , , with gap . The affine-matrix SDP subject to has dual subject to for every and .
The smooth convex inequality convention is that of Inequality constrained programs, tangent cones, constraint qualifications, and KKT: inequalities are written and their multipliers are nonnegative. The Lagrangian dual-value convention is that of Finite-dimensional convex program, Lagrangian dual, and Slater condition.
Depends on
Used by
- Finite-budget primal-dual Newton methods for LP, convex QP, and symmetric cones Algorithm
- Log-barrier central paths and primal-dual Newton residuals Definition
- A two-resource allocation LP and its central path Example
- A two-variable semidefinite relaxation with a matching dual certificate Example
- Norm-bounded robust least squares as an SOCP Example
- Strict feasibility, boundary feasibility, and a weakly infeasible SDP Example
- A linear-quadratic transcription with affine constraints is a convex QP Lemma
- The Lorentz logarithmic barrier has parameter two Lemma
- The LP/QP primal-dual Newton matrix is nonsingular from a strict positive start Lemma
- The negative gradient of a log-homogeneous cone barrier is dual feasible Lemma
- The orthant logarithmic barrier has parameter equal to its dimension Lemma
- The positive semidefinite cone is self-dual and its log determinant barrier has parameter n Lemma
- A verified inexact gradient residual bounds central-path distance and objective error Theorem
- Exact central points have barrier gap m/t or nu/t Theorem
- Fraction-to-boundary steps preserve positivity and exact primal-dual feasibility certifies a gap Theorem
- The conic phase-I margin separates strict feasibility but may leave weak infeasibility undecided Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (standard reference, not scraped)
- Hamza Fawzi, Topics in Convex Optimisation, Lecture 16: Linear, second-order cone, and semidefinite programming (standard reference, not scraped)