Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conic, LP, and convex QP primal-dual models

Definition

For a finite-dimensional real inner-product space E, a cone is a set closed under addition and multiplication by nonnegative scalars. A cone K⊂E is proper when it is closed, convex, pointed (K∩(−K)={0}), and has nonempty interior. Its dual cone is K∗={z∈E:⟨z,s⟩≥0 for every s∈K}.

Let A:Rn→Rp and G:Rn→E be linear, let b∈Rp, c∈Rn, and h∈E. A matrix A has full row rank when its rows are linearly independent. The conic primal problem and its displayed dual pair are inf⁡{cTx:Ax=b, h−Gx∈K},sup⁡{bTy−⟨h,z⟩:ATy−G∗z=c, z∈K∗}, where G∗ is the adjoint, defined by ⟨Gx,z⟩=xTG∗z. For any feasible pair, its gap is cTx−bTy+⟨h,z⟩=⟨z,h−Gx⟩≥0. The special case inf⁡{cTx:Ax=b, x∈K} has dual sup⁡{bTy:ATy+z=c, z∈K∗} and gap ⟨z,x⟩.

For K=R+n, the latter is the standard-form LP min⁡cTx subject to Ax=b, x≥0, with dual variables y free and s=c−ATy≥0. A convex QP in this convention has objective f0(x)=12xTQx+cTx, with symmetric Q⪰0, the same equality, and x≥0. Its Lagrangian is L(x,y,s)=f0(x)+yT(b−Ax)−sTx; a feasible KKT tuple obeys Qx+c−ATy−s=0, and its dual function is q(y,s)=inf⁡w∈RnL(w,y,s). The dual value is d∗=sup⁡y∈Rp, s≥0q(y,s).

For a Lorentz cone Ld+1={(t,u)∈R×Rd:t≥∥u∥2}, let Fj∈Rdj×n, fj∈Rdj, gj∈Rn, and hj∈R. Then ∥Fjx+fj∥2≤gjTx+hj is membership of (gjTx+hj,Fjx+fj) in Ldj+1. With no equality constraints, the SOCP min⁡cTx under these constraints has dual max⁡−∑j(fjTuj+hjτj)subject to ∑j(FjTuj+gjτj)=c,(τj,uj)∈Ldj+1. For symmetric matrices, S⪰0 means vTSv≥0 for every v and the pairing is ⟨X,S⟩=X∙S:=tr⁡(XS). Thus min⁡C∙X subject to A(X)=b, X⪰0 has dual max⁡bTy subject to A∗y+S=C, S⪰0, with gap X∙S. The affine-matrix SDP min⁡cTx subject to F0+∑ixiFi⪰0 has dual max⁡−F0∙Z subject to Fi∙Z=ci for every i and Z⪰0.

The smooth convex inequality convention is that of Inequality constrained programs, tangent cones, constraint qualifications, and KKT: inequalities are written gi(x)≤0 and their multipliers are nonnegative. The Lagrangian dual-value convention is that of Finite-dimensional convex program, Lagrangian dual, and Slater condition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources