How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Inequality constrained programs, tangent cones, constraint qualifications, and KKT
Definition
Let , let be open, and let be . Let with zero allowed; when the target dimension is positive, let and be componentwise , and when it is zero use the unique empty map. The convention for positive dimensions is Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms. The inequality program is to minimize subject to and for every . Its feasible set is . A feasible point is a local minimizer if some open neighborhood of satisfies for every .
At a feasible , the active set is . The Bouligand tangent cone and linearized cone are, respectively,
and
Gradients are column vectors and .
The linear independence constraint qualification (LICQ) holds at when the rows of together with are linearly independent. MFCQ holds at when has full row rank (its rows are linearly independent) and there is with for every active ; the latter condition is vacuous if . Here full row rank for a matrix with zero rows is understood vacuously.
The Mangasarian–Fromovitz constraint qualification (MFCQ) is the condition just stated. The Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) system is the stationarity, feasibility, dual-feasibility, and complementarity system below.
For and , the Lagrangian and KKT system are
The critical cone for a KKT tuple is . These definitions use the differentiability and gradient conventions of Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The Euclidean inner product on , and The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case.
Remarks
This page uses and nonnegative inequality multipliers throughout. The equality-only Lagrange multiplier rule does not supply any inequality multiplier assertion.
Depends on
Used by
- Finite-budget primal-dual Newton methods for LP, convex QP, and symmetric cones Algorithm
- Finite-horizon shooting and Runge–Kutta collocation transcription Algorithm
- Full-step exact-Hessian SQP after active-set identification Algorithm
- Reduced-BFGS SQP KKT step with projected Hessian error Algorithm
- Conic, LP, and convex QP primal-dual models Definition
- Equality and inequality augmented Lagrangians and multiplier updates Definition
- Log-barrier central paths and primal-dual Newton residuals Definition
- Scaled KKT residual and convex normal cone Definition
- The linearized quadratic subproblem in sequential quadratic programming Definition
- A true minimizer with no KKT multipliers when MFCQ fails Example
- Active-set quadratic with an exact KKT certificate Example
- An unconstrained KKT point that is a saddle Example
- A linear-quadratic transcription with affine constraints is a convex QP Lemma
- LICQ implies MFCQ and makes KKT multipliers unique Proposition
- Augmented-Lagrangian multipliers converge locally with summable inner residuals Theorem
- Convex KKT conditions certify a global minimum and an outward normal Theorem
- Critical directions are tangent to every positively weighted active inequality Theorem
- Exact central points have barrier gap m/t or nu/t Theorem
- Exact-Hessian SQP converges locally to a regular transcription KKT point Theorem
- Exact-Hessian SQP converges quadratically on the identified active KKT system Theorem
- MFCQ gives KKT multipliers at a smooth local minimizer Theorem
- MFCQ identifies the linearized and Bouligand tangent cones Theorem
- Primal revised-simplex pivot identities and certificates Theorem
- Reduced-BFGS SQP is locally superlinear under reduced Dennis-More and inverse bounds Theorem
- Second-order necessity on the critical cone under LICQ Theorem
- Strict second-order positivity on the critical cone gives a strict local minimum Theorem
- The scaled KKT residual vanishes exactly at KKT tuples Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nocedal and Wright, Numerical Optimization, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Boyd and Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (standard reference, not scraped)