Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Inequality constrained programs, tangent cones, constraint qualifications, and KKT

Definition

Let n≥1, let U⊆Rn be open, and let f:U→R be C2. Let p,m∈N with zero allowed; when the target dimension is positive, let h:U→Rp and g=(g1,…,gm):U→Rm be componentwise C2, and when it is zero use the unique empty map. The C2 convention for positive dimensions is Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms. The C2 inequality program is to minimize f(x) subject to h(x)=0 and gi(x)≤0 for every i. Its feasible set is C={x∈U:h(x)=0, gi(x)≤0 (1≤i≤m)}. A feasible point x∗ is a local minimizer if some open neighborhood V of x∗ satisfies f(x∗)≤f(y) for every y∈C∩V.

At a feasible x, the active set is I(x)={i:gi(x)=0}. The Bouligand tangent cone and linearized cone are, respectively,

TC(x)={d:∃ tk>0, tk↓0, dk→d, x+tkdk∈C},

and

LC(x)={d:Dh(x)d=0, Dgi(x)d≤0 for every i∈I(x)}.

Gradients are column vectors and Dgi(x)d=∇gi(x)Td.

The linear independence constraint qualification (LICQ) holds at x when the rows of Dh(x) together with {∇gi(x)T:i∈I(x)} are linearly independent. MFCQ holds at x when Dh(x) has full row rank (its rows are linearly independent) and there is w∈ker⁡Dh(x) with Dgi(x)w<0 for every active i; the latter condition is vacuous if I(x)=∅. Here full row rank for a matrix with zero rows is understood vacuously.

The Mangasarian–Fromovitz constraint qualification (MFCQ) is the condition just stated. The Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) system is the stationarity, feasibility, dual-feasibility, and complementarity system below.

For ν∈Rp and λ∈Rm, the Lagrangian and KKT system are

L(x,ν,λ)=f(x)+νTh(x)+λTg(x), h(x)=0,g(x)≤0,λ≥0,λigi(x)=0 (1≤i≤m),∇xL(x,ν,λ)=0.

The critical cone for a KKT tuple is K(x,ν,λ)=LC(x)∩{d:∇f(x)Td=0}. These definitions use the differentiability and gradient conventions of Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, and The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case.

Remarks

This page uses gi≤0 and nonnegative inequality multipliers throughout. The equality-only Lagrange multiplier rule does not supply any inequality multiplier assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources