How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The crystal graph, , and the weight function
Definition
We also write for the datum's integer pairing .
Let be a crystal basis of an integrable chosen -graded type-1 module (Crystal lattices, crystal bases and their crystals) with the induced operators on (The Kashiwara operators and of an integrable module). For write when , and define Then (see below) both numbers are finite and The top of the -string through is the vertex , of weight ; its highest rank-one integer is .
In the crystal graph of the arrows are the inverse raising edges: on an existing edge, increases by , decreases by and the weight decreases by , and the -chains of are the finite strings with vertices.
For a crystal basis of the negative half (The -string decomposition of the negative half) one uses the same arrows and the same finite , but defines the formal as an integer of the abstract root-graded crystal; it may be negative, and it is not the lowering-chain length. The actual lowering-chain length of a negative-half vertex is denoted and equals , because is injective there; the negative half is not asserted to be an integrable finite-string module. No choice principle is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A crystal basis of an integrable chosen -graded type-1 module , and the induced operators on the crystal limit ; for the negative half, a crystal basis of with its infinite strings.
with , and , ; for one has if and only if (Crystal lattices, crystal bases and their crystals, axioms (iv)-(vi)).
On the operators are given by the unique admissible string decomposition, and , with preserving the lattice ; the operators shift weights by , and every element of lies in a finite sum of string positions (The Kashiwara operators and of an integrable module, Uniqueness of the -string decomposition of an integrable module).
For with , the string of any nonzero highest vector in has the nonzero vectors , , and for ; if then (Uniqueness of the -string decomposition of an integrable module).
On the negative half , , if and only if , is injective, raises the root degree by , so it lowers the height in the positive root lattice by one, and lowers the root degree by (The -string decomposition of the negative half).
Verification
Finiteness. Let and let be a lift of . By [F2] the vector is a finite sum of string positions ; along each of the finitely many strings both and move one position and kill the ends, so there are integers with and . The operators preserve and descend to the quotient, so and ; hence and are finite.
A highest lift. Let and let be a homogeneous lift of . Since , the element lies in , hence so does ; by [F2], is a lift of that lies in the image of , that is, in ; it is nonzero because its class is nonzero. Thus is a nonzero -highest vector of , and its weight is by [F2].
The negative half. For and a residue class of root degree , the operator raises the root degree by and hence lowers the height by one; iterating, , so is finite. The operator is injective by [F4], so for every ; the actual lowering-chain length is therefore . The formal quantity is an integer, well defined on the root-graded crystal, and along a lowering edge it changes by : indeed increases by one and decreases by . It can be negative (for example at the unit, and at degree ), and it is not the length of the lowering chain. No integrability or finite-string property of the whole negative half is used.
The component is a finite chain. By [F1] the relation if or for some is symmetric and transitive, and each vertex has at most one -image and at most one -preimage in ; by step 1.1 every class is finite, so the component of is a finite path. It has a unique top, where acts by , and a unique bottom, where acts by ; writing and for the distances from the top and to the bottom gives of vertices of the component.
The chain has length . Put , so and . By [F3], for and for , so exactly positions of this string are nonzero. Their classes are also nonzero: if for , then applying the lattice-preserving gives , contradicting its nonzero top residue. Thus their classes are the vertices reached from by (while nonzero), and by step 2.1 they are precisely the vertices of the component of . Hence the component of has vertices.
The formulas. If is the position of the chain, counted from the top, then and, by step 3.1, . Since by step 1.2, this gives , and also , which is the highest rank-one integer of the top label.
Edges. On an existing arrow , the position increases by one, so increases by and decreases by , while the weight decreases by ; conversely, moves one position up whenever is not the top. By step 2.1 the chain has exactly vertices.
Choice. The data , the operators and the chain positions are given or uniquely determined; all constructions above use finite sums and the unique string decomposition, so no choice principle is used.
Depends on
Used by
- Changing the equality case in the tensor rule breaks the partial-inverse axiom Counterexample
- Highest weight elements, lowering-generated sets and highest weight crystals Definition
- The tensor product crystal B₁⊗ B₂ and its two-case convention Definition
- Dual crystals reverse arrows and weights: two small computations Example
- Highest components in the A₂ tensor crystal B(λ₁)⊗ B(λ₁) Example
- Kashiwara strings in the three-dimensional sl₂-module Example
- Residue translation on small parabolic category-O standards Example
- The crystal graph of the quantum symmetric square of the standard A₂-module Example
- The projection from B(∞) to a highest weight crystal for sl₂ Example
- The tensor crystal B(1)⊗ B(1) for sl₂ Example
- The i-string components of a lattice vector and the single surviving component modulo q Lemma
- The vector representation has a perfect crystal of level one and a lower global basis Lemma
- The weight, εᵢ and φᵢ formulas for the tensor product crystal Lemma
- The dual crystal: reversed arrows, negated weights and swapped ε/φ Proposition
- Highest weight components in a tensor product crystal Theorem
- Simple and indecomposable-projective crystals agree with B(Λ) Theorem
- The canonical crystal B(λ) is a highest weight crystal of highest weight λ Theorem
- The crystal basis B(∞) of the negative half Theorem
- The crystal basis of a tensor product and the two-case operator rule Theorem
- The crystal of the level-one Fock space is the good-node partition graph Theorem
- The grand loop: existence of the highest weight crystal bases Theorem
- Uniqueness: crystal bases of integrable modules decompose into highest weight crystals Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Masaki Kashiwara, On crystal bases of the q-analogue of universal enveloping algebras, Duke Math. J. 63 (1991), no. 2, 465-516 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kyeonghoon Jeong, Seok-Jin Kang and Masaki Kashiwara, Crystal Bases for Quantum Generalized Kac-Moody Algebras, arXiv:math/0305390 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard Borcherds, Mark Haiman, Theo Johnson-Freyd, Nicolai Reshetikhin and Vera Serganova, Berkeley Lectures on Lie Groups and Quantum Groups (book-length lecture notes, last updated 18 January 2024) (standard reference, not scraped)