Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The crystal graph, εi, φi and the weight function

Definition

We also write ⟨hi,μ⟩ for the datum's integer pairing ⟨μ,hi⟩.

Let (L,B) be a crystal basis of an integrable chosen P-graded type-1 module M (Crystal lattices, crystal bases and their crystals) with the induced operators e~i,f~i on L/qL (The Kashiwara operators e~i and f~i of an integrable module). For b∈B write wt(b)=μ when b∈Bμ, and define εi(b):=max⁡{n≥0:e~i nb≠0},φi(b):=max⁡{n≥0:f~i nb≠0}. Then (see below) both numbers are finite and φi(b)=εi(b)+⟨hi,wt(b)⟩. The top of the i-string through b is the vertex e~i εi(b)b, of weight wt(b)+εi(b)αi; its highest rank-one integer is ⟨hi,wt(b)⟩+2εi(b)=εi(b)+φi(b).

In the crystal graph of (L,B) the arrows b→f~ib are the inverse raising edges: on an existing edge, εi increases by 1, φi decreases by 1 and the weight decreases by αi, and the i-chains of B are the finite strings with εi(b)+φi(b)+1 vertices.

For a crystal basis of the negative half Uq− (The i-string decomposition of the negative half) one uses the same arrows and the same finite εi, but defines the formal φi:=εi+⟨hi,wt⟩ as an integer of the abstract root-graded crystal; it may be negative, and it is not the lowering-chain length. The actual lowering-chain length of a negative-half vertex is denoted ℓi− and equals +∞, because f~i is injective there; the negative half is not asserted to be an integrable finite-string module. No choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A crystal basis (L,B) of an integrable chosen P-graded type-1 module M, and the induced operators e~i,f~i on the crystal limit L/qL; for the negative half, a crystal basis of Uq− with its infinite strings.

[F1]

B=⨆μBμ with Bμ⊆Lμ/qLμ, and e~iB⊆B∪{0}, f~iB⊆B∪{0}; for b,b′∈B one has f~ib=b′ if and only if b=e~ib′ (Crystal lattices, crystal bases and their crystals, axioms (iv)-(vi)).

[F2]

On M the operators are given by the unique admissible string decomposition, f~ie~i=id−ptop and e~if~i=id−pbottom, with ptop,pbottom preserving the lattice L; the operators shift weights by ∓αi, and every element of M lies in a finite sum of string positions (The Kashiwara operators e~i and f~i of an integrable module, Uniqueness of the i-string decomposition of an integrable module).

[F3]

For μ∈P with a=⟨μ,hi⟩≥0, the string of any nonzero highest vector in Hμ=ker⁡Ei∩Mμ has the nonzero vectors Fi(n)h, 0≤n≤a, and Fi(n)h=0 for n>a; if a<0 then Hμ=0 (Uniqueness of the i-string decomposition of an integrable module).

[F4]

On the negative half Uq−, e~if~i=id, e~iu=0 if and only if u∈ker⁡ei′, f~i is injective, e~i raises the root degree by αi, so it lowers the height in the positive root lattice by one, and f~i lowers the root degree by αi (The i-string decomposition of the negative half).

Verification

technique · direct. Finiteness comes from the finite string expansion of a lift; the chain structure comes from the partial-inverse axiom; the weight formula is read off the rank-one string of a highest lift
1.1F2given

Finiteness. Let b∈B and let x∈L be a lift of b. By [F2] the vector x is a finite sum of string positions Fi(n)un; along each of the finitely many strings both e~i and f~i move one position and kill the ends, so there are integers N,M with f~iNx=0 and e~iMx=0. The operators preserve L and descend to the quotient, so f~iNb=0 and e~iMb=0; hence εi(b) and φi(b) are finite.

1.2F1F2

A highest lift. Let btop:=e~iεi(b)b and let y∈Lwt(btop) be a homogeneous lift of btop. Since e~ibtop=0, the element e~iy lies in qL, hence so does f~ie~iy; by [F2], h:=(id−f~ie~i)(y)=y−f~ie~iy is a lift of btop that lies in the image of ptop=id−f~ie~i, that is, in ker⁡e~i=ker⁡Ei; it is nonzero because its class btop is nonzero. Thus h is a nonzero Ei-highest vector of M, and its weight is μ:=wt(btop)=wt(b)+εi(b)αi by [F2].

1.3F4algebra

The negative half. For Uq− and a residue class b of root degree −ν, the operator e~i raises the root degree by αi and hence lowers the height ht⁡(ν) by one; iterating, e~i ht⁡(ν)+1b=0, so εi(b) is finite. The operator f~i is injective by [F4], so f~i nb≠0 for every n≥0; the actual lowering-chain length is therefore ℓi−=+∞. The formal quantity φi:=εi+⟨hi,wt⟩ is an integer, well defined on the root-graded crystal, and along a lowering edge it changes by +1−2=−1: indeed εi increases by one and ⟨hi,wt⟩ decreases by ⟨hi,αi⟩=2. It can be negative (for example φi=0 at the unit, and φi=εi−∑jaijνj at degree −ν=−∑jνjαj), and it is not the length of the lowering chain. No integrability or finite-string property of the whole negative half is used.

2.1F1step 1.1

The component is a finite chain. By [F1] the relation b∼b′ if f~imb=b′ or f~imb′=b for some m≥0 is symmetric and transitive, and each vertex has at most one f~i-image and at most one f~i-preimage in B; by step 1.1 every class is finite, so the component of b is a finite path. It has a unique top, where e~i acts by 0, and a unique bottom, where f~i acts by 0; writing εi and φi for the distances from the top and to the bottom gives εi(b)+φi(b)+1=# of vertices of the component.

3.1F3step 1.2

The chain has length a+1. Put a:=⟨μ,hi⟩, so a≥0 and h∈Hμ. By [F3], Fi(n)h≠0 for 0≤n≤a and Fi(n)h=0 for n>a, so exactly a+1 positions of this string are nonzero. Their classes are also nonzero: if Fi(n)h=f~inh∈qL for n≤a, then applying the lattice-preserving e~in gives h∈qL, contradicting its nonzero top residue. Thus their classes are the vertices reached from btop by f~i (while nonzero), and by step 2.1 they are precisely the vertices of the component of b. Hence the component of b has a+1 vertices.

4.1step 1.2step 3.1algebra

The formulas. If b is the position n of the chain, counted from the top, then εi(b)=n and, by step 3.1, φi(b)=a−n. Since a=⟨μ,hi⟩=⟨hi,wt(b)⟩+2n by step 1.2, this gives φi(b)=⟨hi,wt(b)⟩+n=εi(b)+⟨hi,wt(b)⟩, and also εi(b)+φi(b)=a=⟨hi,wt(b)⟩+2εi(b), which is the highest rank-one integer of the top label.

5.1step 2.1step 4.1

Edges. On an existing arrow b→f~ib, the position increases by one, so εi increases by 1 and φi decreases by 1, while the weight decreases by αi; conversely, e~i moves one position up whenever b is not the top. By step 2.1 the chain has exactly εi(b)+φi(b)+1 vertices.

6.1given∎

Choice. The data (L,B), the operators and the chain positions are given or uniquely determined; all constructions above use finite sums and the unique string decomposition, so no choice principle is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources