How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dual crystals reverse arrows and weights: two small computations
Example
The example computes the dual crystal of The dual crystal: reversed arrows, negated weights and swapped in two small cases.
(A) For , let with and (as in The tensor crystal for ). Then has the single arrow , weights , and equal to at and at . Hence as crystals, realized with the highest vertex .
(B) For , let be the standard crystal of Highest components in the tensor crystal . Then has the arrows and , weights at , and exchanged; this is the crystal of the dual three-dimensional module, so .
(C) On the tensor square of (A), under ; both sides split as because each of is self-dual along the chain reversal (weights are symmetric).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The dual-crystal construction of The dual crystal: reversed arrows, negated weights and swapped applied to the two-element crystal of and the three-element standard crystal of , and the tensor square of The tensor crystal for .
The dual crystal (The dual crystal: reversed arrows, negated weights and swapped ): , , , , , with reversed arrows and the tensor swap .
The rank-one crystal (Divided-power commutation and the simple string modules, as used in The tensor crystal for ): with the single arrow , weights and equal to at and at .
The standard crystal (Highest components in the tensor crystal ): with arrows , weights , and , ; the weights satisfy .
Crystal graph conventions (The crystal graph, , and the weight function) and the tensor product crystal (The tensor product crystal and its two-case convention) with its formulas (The weight, and formulas for the tensor product crystal).
The self-duality of the one-colour chains (The Kashiwara lattices and and their generating sets): is the three-element chain of weights and the one-element crystal of weight , both fixed by the dual construction along chain reversal.
The defining quantum-group relations and their universal factorization are those of The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations. A nonzero integrable cyclic highest weight module of dominant weight is isomorphic to by The integrable quantum highest weight module exists and is unique(ii).
The module Kashiwara operators shift divided-power strings and commute with module isomorphisms (The Kashiwara operators and of an integrable module). The canonical lattice and residue set are generated by their lowering words from the highest vector (The Kashiwara lattices and and their generating sets).
The antipode formulas are , and (The Drinfeld–Jimbo formulas define a Hopf algebra); on a finite-dimensional module's linear dual the contragredient action is , which is a left action because .
Verification
(A) Apply and of [F1] to : gives ; gives ; gives ; gives . So the only arrow is and the values are at and at ; weights are negated by [F1]. Comparing with [F2], the map , preserves arrows, weights and , so with highest vertex .
(B) By [F1] the arrows become , with weights along that chain. The pairs at are , and the color-two pairs are . Construct a module on with these successive weights: set , , , , all other images zero, and . These maps satisfy [F6]: the weight shifts give the toral relations, the same-color commutators have diagonal entries and , matching , and the cross-color commutators vanish. Each and each alternating triple with vanishes, proving both Serre relations. The module is nonzero, integrable and generated by its highest vector of dominant weight , so F6 identifies it with . Each color has one length-one string and one trivial string; [F7] therefore makes the canonical lattice with residue crystal . The map , , preserves all crystal data. To check the module-dual description as well, realize the standard module by , , , , the given weights and zero remaining images. The same relation check with colors exchanged identifies this cyclic integrable module with by [F6]. For its linear dual basis , [F8] gives the displayed -actions on , , (here ). Thus is the dual three-dimensional module, without a crystal-component uniqueness or AC premise.
(C) The swap sends to . On the right the three-element lowering chain is , with weights ; each next raising reverses the preceding arrow by [F4]. The remaining vertex has weight zero and both operators vanish there: the tie selects the bottom second factor for lowering and the top first factor for raising. This is the image of the isolated dual vertex . The reversed three-element chain is and the isolated vertex is by [F5], so both sides have the claimed decomposition.
The arrow and tensor calculations are finite applications of [F1]; the canonical identification in (B) uses the explicit relation check, highest-weight module universality [F6] and lowering-word construction [F7]. No choice principle or general crystal-component uniqueness theorem is invoked.
Depends on
- The dual crystal: reversed arrows, negated weights and swapped $\varepsilon/\varphi$
- The tensor product crystal $B_1\otimes B_2$ and its two-case convention
- The weight, $\varepsilon_i$ and $\varphi_i$ formulas for the tensor product crystal
- The crystal graph, $\varepsilon_i$, $\varphi_i$ and the weight function
- The Kashiwara lattices $\mathcal L(\lambda)$ and $\mathcal L(\infty)$ and their generating sets
- The tensor crystal $B(1)\otimes B(1)$ for $\mathfrak{sl}_2$
- Highest components in the $A_2$ tensor crystal $B(\lambda_1)\otimes B(\lambda_1)$
- Divided-power commutation and the simple $U_{q_i}(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ string modules
- The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations
- The integrable quantum highest weight module exists and is unique
- The Kashiwara operators $\tilde e_i$ and $\tilde f_i$ of an integrable module
- The Drinfeld–Jimbo formulas define a Hopf algebra
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mark Shimozono, Crystals for Dummies (lecture notes, 28 August 2005) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard Borcherds, Mark Haiman, Theo Johnson-Freyd, Nicolai Reshetikhin and Vera Serganova, Berkeley Lectures on Lie Groups and Quantum Groups (book-length lecture notes, last updated 18 January 2024) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kyeonghoon Jeong, Seok-Jin Kang and Masaki Kashiwara, Crystal Bases for Quantum Generalized Kac-Moody Algebras, arXiv:math/0305390 (standard reference, not scraped)