Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dual crystals reverse arrows and weights: two small computations

Example

The example computes the dual crystal of The dual crystal: reversed arrows, negated weights and swapped ε/φ in two small cases.

(A) For g=sl2, let B(1)={v0→1v1} with wt(v0)=λ1, wt(v1)=−λ1 and ε1(v0)=0,φ1(v0)=1,ε1(v1)=1,φ1(v1)=0 (as in The tensor crystal B(1)⊗B(1) for sl2). Then B(1)∨={v0∨,v1∨} has the single arrow v1∨→1v0∨, weights wt(v0∨)=−λ1, wt(v1∨)=λ1, and (ε1,φ1) equal to (1,0) at v0∨ and (0,1) at v1∨. Hence B(1)∨≅B(1) as crystals, realized with the highest vertex v1∨.

(B) For g=sl3, let B(λ1)={u1→1u2→2u3} be the standard crystal of Highest components in the A2 tensor crystal B(λ1)⊗B(λ1). Then B(λ1)∨={u1∨,u2∨,u3∨} has the arrows u2∨→1u1∨ and u3∨→2u2∨, weights −λ1, −λ2+λ1, λ2 at u1∨,u2∨,u3∨, and ε/φ exchanged; this is the crystal B(λ2) of the dual three-dimensional module, so B(λ1)∨≅B(λ2).

(C) On the tensor square of (A), (B(1)⊗B(1))∨≅B(1)∨⊗B(1)∨ under (b1⊗b2)∨↦b2∨⊗b1∨; both sides split as B(2)⊔B(0) because each of B(2),B(0) is self-dual along the chain reversal (weights 2λ1,0,−2λ1 are symmetric).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The dual-crystal construction of The dual crystal: reversed arrows, negated weights and swapped ε/φ applied to the two-element crystal B(1)={v0→1v1} of sl2 and the three-element standard crystal B(λ1)={u1→1u2→2u3} of sl3, and the tensor square B(1)⊗B(1) of The tensor crystal B(1)⊗B(1) for sl2.

[F1]

The dual crystal (The dual crystal: reversed arrows, negated weights and swapped ε/φ): wt(b∨)=−wt(b), εi(b∨)=φi(b), φi(b∨)=εi(b), f~i(b∨)=(e~ib)∨, e~i(b∨)=(f~ib)∨, with reversed arrows and the tensor swap (B1⊗B2)∨≅B2∨⊗B1∨.

[F2]

The rank-one crystal (Divided-power commutation and the simple Uqi(sl2) string modules, as used in The tensor crystal B(1)⊗B(1) for sl2): B(1)={v0,v1} with the single arrow v0→1v1, weights λ1,−λ1 and (ε1,φ1) equal to (0,1) at v0 and (1,0) at v1.

[F3]

The standard sl3 crystal (Highest components in the A2 tensor crystal B(λ1)⊗B(λ1)): B(λ1)={u1,u2,u3} with arrows u1→1u2→2u3, weights λ1,λ2−λ1,−λ2, and ε1=(0,1,0), ε2=(0,0,1); the weights satisfy λ2−λ1=−(λ1−λ2).

[F5]

The self-duality of the one-colour chains (The Kashiwara lattices L(λ) and L(∞) and their generating sets): B(2) is the three-element chain of weights 2λ1,0,−2λ1 and B(0) the one-element crystal of weight 0, both fixed by the dual construction along chain reversal.

[F6]

The defining quantum-group relations and their universal factorization are those of The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations. A nonzero integrable cyclic highest weight module of dominant weight λ is isomorphic to V(λ) by The integrable quantum highest weight module exists and is unique(ii).

[F7]

The module Kashiwara operators shift divided-power strings and commute with module isomorphisms (The Kashiwara operators e~i and f~i of an integrable module). The canonical lattice and residue set are generated by their lowering words from the highest vector (The Kashiwara lattices L(λ) and L(∞) and their generating sets).

[F8]

The antipode formulas are S(Kh)=K−h, S(Ei)=−EiKi and S(Fi)=−Ki−1Fi (The Drinfeld–Jimbo formulas define a Hopf algebra); on a finite-dimensional module's linear dual the contragredient action is (xξ)(v)=ξ(S(x)v), which is a left action because S(xy)=S(y)S(x).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2

(A) Apply f~1(b∨)=(e~1b)∨ and e~1(b∨)=(f~1b)∨ of [F1] to b=v0,v1: e~1v0=0 gives f~1(v0∨)=0; e~1v1=v0 gives f~1(v1∨)=v0∨; f~1v0=v1 gives e~1(v0∨)=v1∨; f~1v1=0 gives e~1(v1∨)=0. So the only arrow is v1∨→1v0∨ and the values (ε1,φ1)=(φ1,ε1) are (1,0) at v0∨ and (0,1) at v1∨; weights are negated by [F1]. Comparing with [F2], the map v1∨↦v0, v0∨↦v1 preserves arrows, weights and ε/φ, so B(1)∨≅B(1) with highest vertex v1∨.

1.2F1F3F6F7F8algebra

(B) By [F1] the arrows become u3∨→2u2∨→1u1∨, with weights λ2,λ1−λ2,−λ1 along that chain. The pairs (ε1,φ1) at (u1∨,u2∨,u3∨) are (1,0),(0,1),(0,0), and the color-two pairs are (0,0),(1,0),(0,1). Construct a module on w1,w2,w3 with these successive weights: set F2w1=w2, F1w2=w3, E2w2=w1, E1w3=w2, all other Ei,Fi images zero, and Khwj=q⟨wt(wj),h⟩wj. These maps satisfy [F6]: the weight shifts give the toral relations, the same-color commutators have diagonal entries (0,1,−1) and (1,−1,0), matching (Ki−Ki−1)/(qi−qi−1), and the cross-color commutators vanish. Each Ei2,Fi2 and each alternating triple EiEjEi,FiFjFi with i≠j vanishes, proving both A2 Serre relations. The module is nonzero, integrable and generated by its highest vector w1 of dominant weight λ2, so F6 identifies it with V(λ2). Each color has one length-one string and one trivial string; [F7] therefore makes the canonical lattice ⨁jA0wj with residue crystal B(λ2). The map u3∨↦w1, u2∨↦w2, u1∨↦w3 preserves all crystal data. To check the module-dual description as well, realize the standard module by F1u1=u2, F2u2=u3, E1u2=u1, E2u3=u2, the given weights and zero remaining images. The same relation check with colors exchanged identifies this cyclic integrable module with V(λ1) by [F6]. For its linear dual basis uj∗, [F8] gives the displayed w-actions on w1=u3∗, w2=−q1u2∗, w3=q12u1∗ (here q1=q2). Thus V(λ2) is the dual three-dimensional module, without a crystal-component uniqueness or AC premise.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F4F5

(C) The swap sends (vj⊗vk)∨ to vk∨⊗vj∨. On the right the three-element lowering chain is (v1∨⊗v1∨)→(v0∨⊗v1∨)→(v0∨⊗v0∨), with weights 2λ1,0,−2λ1; each next raising reverses the preceding arrow by [F4]. The remaining vertex v1∨⊗v0∨ has weight zero and both operators vanish there: the tie φ1(v1∨)=ε1(v0∨)=1 selects the bottom second factor for lowering and the top first factor for raising. This is the image of the isolated dual vertex (v0⊗v1)∨. The reversed three-element chain is B(2) and the isolated vertex is B(0) by [F5], so both sides have the claimed decomposition.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F1F6F7given∎

The arrow and tensor calculations are finite applications of [F1]; the canonical identification in (B) uses the explicit relation check, highest-weight module universality [F6] and lowering-word construction [F7]. No choice principle or general crystal-component uniqueness theorem is invoked.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources