How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Simple and indecomposable-projective crystals agree with
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice.
For the standard homogeneous cyclotomic quotient over any field with the general real symmetrizable datum and graded KLR parameters, let be the normalized -self-dual simple classes. Set , and . For , define by the unique simple isomorphism type in the socle of one-step right restriction, with its unique self-dual normalization, and set when ; define by the unique self-dual normalization of the simple head of right induction when nonzero, otherwise zero. The one-step socle/head is one shifted copy, not a quantum-factorial multiplicity. These data form a crystal canonically isomorphic to , with vacuum sent to . The normalized indecomposable projectives carry the same crystal by their normalized simple heads and covers. The projective graph here is explicitly transported from these labels, rather than obtained by applying linear Kashiwara operators to an unspecified projective basis. The highest-weight quotient has simple survivors exactly when for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and the standard cyclotomic quotient over any field with general real symmetrizable datum and graded KLR parameters, and the normalized simple and projective labels of Cyclotomic projective covers and dualities descend through the quotient and Cyclotomic diagram duality and graded module duals.
The one-step theorem One-step simple restriction and induction, and the first-dot index: for a cyclotomic (or generic) simple , one-step restriction has a single simple socle and head once, with decreasing by one, induction has the unique simple head occurring once, and the first-dot index identifies the first-strand ideal criterion with ; this works over the original field including positive characteristic.
The two-colour jump formula and strict elementary embeddings The two-colour jump formula and strict elementary embeddings: the full general- jump formula, strictness and everywhere-positive extraction, from actual shuffle filtrations and divided restriction multiplicities; the linear Serre relation is applied in , not to a non-linear simple operator.
The canonical elementary extraction and survivors Canonical elementary crystal extraction and highest-weight survivors, the crystal of The canonical crystal is a highest weight crystal of highest weight , and the epsilon/phi conventions of The crystal graph, , and the weight function; the two Grothendieck identifications The cyclotomic projective is the integral highest-weight module and The cyclotomic module is the restricted dual integral highest-weight module.
Proof
Proof technique: inflate to the generic algebra, apply the one-step and two-colour inputs to the simple graph, identify it with the canonical crystal and its highest-weight quotient, and transport the labels to projective covers.
The simple graph. Inflate a cyclotomic simple to the generic algebra; by [F1] the one-step restriction has a single simple socle and head once and induction has the unique simple head, giving well-defined operators on shift orbits with decreasing by one under and increasing by one under . By [F2] the graph is lowering-generated with strict elementary extractions and positive extraction at every nonvacuum vertex, over every field including positive characteristic. The normalized-label supplier in the Given identifies each simple shift orbit with its unique -self-dual representative. Taking that representative for each nonzero socle and induction head lifts both operators to and preserves their partial-inverse identities.
Identification with . Apply the canonical elementary extraction of [F3]: the generic simple graph is canonically and the first-strand cyclotomic survivors are exactly the vertices with for all , which is the crystal with vacuum ; the survivor criterion is for every by the first-dot index of [F1]. The one-step socle/head is one shifted copy, so no quantum-factorial multiplicity enters.
Projective labels. The normalized indecomposable projectives carry the same crystal by their normalized simple heads and covers: the quotient-cover lemma pairs each projective cover with its simple head without scaling and preserves the label under the quotient, while the two Grothendieck identifications of [F3] record the same labels on and . The projective graph is therefore explicitly transported from the simple labels, not obtained by applying linear Kashiwara operators to an unspecified projective basis. The assumed Axiom of Choice supplies the inherited hypotheses of the canonical-extraction and Grothendieck-identification suppliers of [F3], including the integral projective theorem and its restricted-dual consequence; transporting normalized cover labels introduces no further choice.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The crystal graph, $\varepsilon_i$, $\varphi_i$ and the weight function
- Cyclotomic diagram duality and graded module duals
- Cyclotomic KLR induction and restriction functors
- Canonical elementary crystal extraction and highest-weight survivors
- Cyclotomic projective covers and dualities descend through the quotient
- One-step simple restriction and induction, and the first-dot index
- The two-colour jump formula and strict elementary embeddings
- The cyclotomic module $G_0$ is the restricted dual integral highest-weight module
- The cyclotomic projective $K_0$ is the integral highest-weight module
- The canonical crystal $B(\lambda)$ is a highest weight crystal of highest weight $\lambda$
Used by
- Cyclotomic extension of scalars respects the based quotient Lemma
- Extremal word characters detect normalized cyclotomic simple labels Lemma
- Positive-characteristic Specht head and cyclotomic crystal labels agree Lemma
- The QG-8 categorification transports across the blockwise Hecke-KLR bridge Proposition
- Self-dual indecomposable cyclotomic projectives give the lower global basis Theorem
- Self-dual simple cyclotomic modules give the upper global basis Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Seok-Jin Kang and Masaki Kashiwara, Categorification of Highest Weight Modules via Khovanov-Lauda-Rouquier Algebras, arXiv:1102.4677v4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Aaron D. Lauda and Monica Vazirani, Crystals from categorified quantum groups, Advances in Math. 228 (2011) 803-861, arXiv:0909.1810v2 (standard reference, not scraped)